[jdx]

https://entire.com/gh/jdx/-/trails/2807/changes/mise/1029

core/test_java_shorthand_vendor_slow locked java 17 and expected the newest Temurin 17 build to resolve on every platform. On 2026-10-22 Adoptium published Temurin 17.0.21+9 with only linux-x64 and mac-aarch64 binaries, so mise lock --bump java refused to replace the locked 17.0.2 entries for windows-x64, linux-arm64 and macos-x64. That failed e2e-linux-7 and trusted / e2e on the 2026.10.19 release PR (#14892), and left test-ci and release red.

mise's behavior is correct here; the test just shouldn't depend on whichever upstream build is newest. The bump step now uses a java = "17.0.20" request, a line published for all platforms. The final vendor-switch section uses java = "17.0.2" for both the OpenJDK and Temurin locks, so it still checks that an uninstalled OpenJDK entry is replaced under the same request; Temurin's 17.0.2+8 is fixed metadata that upstream releases can't change. The other OpenJDK steps keep java = "17". The assertions are unchanged apart from the expected "not in the lockfile" message naming java@17.0.2.

Validated by running TEST_ALL=1 mise run test:e2e core/test_java_shorthand_vendor_slow locally while Temurin 17.0.21+9 was still partial; it passes.

AI-assisted — Tool: Claude Code; model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5; version: claude-code_2-1-308_agent.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Expanded automated coverage for Java lockfile updates, including version validation and handling of a vendor mismatch during locked installation.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: jdx/mise
• Branch: fix/e2e-java-shorthand-partial-release
• File: .coderabbit.yaml
• Commit: 1f2bcc2
• Layers: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited), Organization UI (inherited)
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 16bdf759-53ba-4362-a2ee-583ed9ea76fb

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25e29c3 and 1f2bcc2.

Files selected for processing: 1

• e2e/core/test_java_shorthand_vendor_slow

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 8 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

The end-to-end test pins Java to 17.0.20 before bumping the lock and checks the resulting Temurin entry. It then restores the 17.0.2 pin and checks locked installation after creating an OpenJDK lock entry.

Changes: Java shorthand lock test

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Bump and vendor lock checks e2e/core/test_java_shorthand_vendor_slow	The test checks that the bumped Temurin entry matches the expected version format and excludes download.java.net. It then creates an OpenJDK lock entry and expects locked installation to fail because java@17.0.2 is absent from the lockfile.

Priority: Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 1f2bc

The test update is consistent with its stated purpose and is mergeable.

Pre-merge checks: 5

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title clearly describes the main change: pinning the Java relock E2E test to a fully published Temurin line.
Docstring Coverage		No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[greptile-apps]

Confidence Score: 5/5

[Low impact] The PR appears safe to merge; no new actionable issues were found.

Summary

Pins the Java relock test to known release lines without changing application code.

• The Java vendor test pins its bump and vendor-switch requests.

_{Reviews (2) · Last reviewed commit: "test: keep the same java request across ..." · Reviewed by Greptile}