Skip to content

RFC: Update the AI policy - #942

Merged
MabezDev merged 1 commit into
rust-embedded:masterfrom
sgued:ai-update
Sep 23, 2026
Merged

MabezDev merged 1 commit into
rust-embedded:masterfrom
sgued:ai-update

Conversation

@sgued

@sgued sgued commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This follows the discussion had during the meeting on 2026-09-22: #940

I tried to be succinct, while still explaining why the policy is that way.

This follows the discussion had during the meeting on 2026-09-22
rust-embedded#940
@sgued
sgued requested a review from a team as a code owner September 23, 2026 06:53
@MabezDev
MabezDev merged commit 11b5b33 into rust-embedded:master Sep 23, 2026
@sgued

sgued commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@MabezDev did you intend to merge it? I would have expected some more feedback and approval from other members before merging this. Like in the previous PR adding the policy: #876

@MabezDev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Apologies, I thought a smallish wording update wouldn't need such reviews, but now I see the discussion item has some debate there.

Feedback can be added here and I can follow up with a PR. I'll ping the discussion thread to ensure those get a chance to sign off on this wording.

Comment thread CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
When using AI tools for contributing, human oversight remains critical.

- **You are responsible for your contributions.** It is your responsibility to review, test, and understand everything you submit. Submitting unverified or low-quality machine-generated content creates an unfair review burden on the community and is not an acceptable contribution. Contributors should review and understand their own submissions before asking the community to review their code.
- **AI tools must not replace humain-to-human contributons.** AI generated prose must not be used in code comments, commit messages, github issues or pull requests descriptions and comments. AI generated prose tend to require time and energy to sort trough, do not expect fellow contributors to do it for you. You must understand what you submit, explaining it in your own words proves that you do, while AI prose raises doubts.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- **AI tools must not replace humain-to-human contributons.** AI generated prose must not be used in code comments, commit messages, github issues or pull requests descriptions and comments. AI generated prose tend to require time and energy to sort trough, do not expect fellow contributors to do it for you. You must understand what you submit, explaining it in your own words proves that you do, while AI prose raises doubts.
- **AI tools must not replace humain-to-human contributons.** AI generated prose must not be used in code comments, commit messages, GitHub issues or pull requests descriptions and comments. AI generated prose tend to require time and energy to sort through, do not expect fellow contributors to do it for you. You must understand what you submit, so explaining it in your own words proves that you do, while AI prose raises doubts.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

humain?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

An unfortunate typo 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I pushed the fixes to the ai-update branch in my fork but I'm not sure how to proceed with the already-merged PR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I opened #943 but I'm equally happy with a new PR with these changes too.

@adamgreig

adamgreig commented Sep 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Would you mind re-opening this PR? (edit: possibly you'll have to create a new one from the same branch since this got merged).

@sgued sgued mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2026
@sgued

sgued commented Sep 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Re-Opened in: #944

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants