Repository navigation
RFC: Add AI tool use policy in code of conduct - #876
Conversation
|
I love this |
|
This is a reasonable approach. I like it. |
newAM
left a comment
newAM
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is all common sense for anyone familiar with OSS communities and the discourse around AI. I think it's a good to spell it out for those who are new to OSS. I am in favor of adding this.
I am curious, has anyone in the WG had a negative experience with a reviewer or submitter using AI? In other words is this policy to make the WG position clear before problems exist, or is this already a problem?
Yes |
|
Thank you for writing this up, it's great! |
|
First-rate. Thanks much. |
| Our golden rule is that a contribution should be worth more to the project than the time it takes to review it. If a maintainer judges that a contribution is extractive (i.e., it is generated with tool-assistance or simply requires significant revision), they | ||
| should copy-paste the following response, add the `extractive` label if applicable, and refrain from further engagement: | ||
|
|
||
| > This PR appears to be extractive, and requires additional justification for why it is valuable enough to the project for us to review it. Please see our developer policy on AI-generated contributions: https://github.com/rust-embedded/wg/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md#AI-Tool-Use-Policy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this specific to the use of AI ? LLMs facilitates this but It feels like this section could be a ## too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can make it ##, sure! If you open a suggestion I will add it to the PR
I can't say for sure but I have strong suspicions. |
adamgreig
left a comment
adamgreig
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for writing this up, looks good to me and captures our discussion last week well. What do you think of these slight wording tweaks?
Co-authored-by: Adam Greig <adam@adamgreig.com>
709fd60
Co-authored-by: Adam Greig <adam@adamgreig.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Greig <adam@adamgreig.com>
jamesmunns
left a comment
jamesmunns
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was very well written and thoughtful, thank you!
|
Which team has sign-off for this PR? |
|
(I've added @rust-embedded/all, feel free to add a more "load bearing" review of approval if you'd like, we're aiming for 11/33 members of rust-embedded/all, as it's been more than a week as per https://github.com/rust-embedded/wg/blob/master/rfcs/0206-voting-majority.md) |
|
@adamgreig or @therealprof we have at least 11 votes, including the ones that are "sounds great" but are not green checks. I believe we can merge this and count it as approved. (pinging you two to press the button wearing your official core team hats :) ) |
As discussed on the previous WG meeting, I think we should include a few sentences regarding the use of AI tools in our code of conduct.
I adapted the proposed text for the LLVM project to our needs. Let me know what you think!