Repository navigation
Conversation
plbossart
requested review from
RanderWang,
jack-cy-yu,
oder-chiou,
ryans-lee and
shumingfan
as code owners
November 17, 2020 14:55
This was referenced Nov 17, 2020
Closed
The current error log does not provide details on the type of transfers and which address/count was requested. All this information can help locate in which parts of the configuration process an error occurred. Co-developed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
The existing code reports a NAK only when ACK=0 This is not aligned with the SoundWire 1.x specifications. Table 32 in the SoundWire 1.2 specification shows that a Device shall not set NAK=1 if ACK=1. But Table 33 shows the Combined Response may very well be NAK=1/ACK=1, e.g. if another Device than the one addressed reports a parity error. NAK=1 signals a 'Command_Aborted', regardless of the ACK bit value. Move the tests for NAK so that the NAK=1/ACK=1 combination is properly detected according to the specification. Fixes: 956baa1 ('soundwire: cdns: Add sdw_master_ops and IO transfer support') Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
There are too many logs on startup, e.g. [ 8811.851497] cdns_fill_msg_resp: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 8811.851497] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not received [ 8811.851498] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not received [ 8811.851499] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not received [ 8811.851499] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not received [ 8811.851500] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not received [ 8811.851500] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not received [ 8811.851502] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg ignored for Slave 0 [ 8811.851503] soundwire sdw-master-0: No more devices to enumerate We can skip the 'Msg Ack not received' since it's typical of the enumeration end, and conversely add the information on which command fails. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
plbossart
force-pushed
the
sdw/improve-transfer-failed-detection
branch
from
November 17, 2020 16:03
3e6b2f5 to
7f6b86d
Compare
Member
Author
|
I am going to take a calculated risk and use my superpowers to merge this PR without reviews, so that we can have better reports in daily tests. That will leave us 3 working days until the Thanksgiving break to figure out what happened. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contributions from @bardliao and @plbossart combined in one PR.
This replaces PR #2559 and PR #2564