You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This looks good. We probably would still need to invent some way to denote things like "all resources including this shape". Perhaps that could be an extension of an asset collection.
This looks good. We probably would still need to invent some way to denote things like "all resources including this shape". Perhaps that could be an extension of an asset collection.
Of relevance is work by @besteves4@vroddon and mysel - where the ODRL policy is used to express preferences for sharing categories of data for specific purposes. Example:
How does ODRL fit with/compete with gConsent? gConsent has a concept of what purpose the information or access is going to be used for, which I think is important.
GConsent (and others like DPV) can complement ODRL to express legal concepts of Purpose and Processing (e.g. EU/GDPR). ODRL's Action concept tells what is the operation, but not why it needs to happen (as you point out). To have ODRL express the purpose of action, possibilities are:
Combine Processing and Purpose together into an Action. e.g. Collect for Service Provision where Collect is processing operation and Service Provision is the purpose (missing item is data i.e. Collect <data> for .... which is an Asset in ODRL)
Consider Processing to be same/similar as Action and express Purpose as part of a restriction on where that action can be applied. This is the approach taken in my earlier comment
Activity
jaxoncreed commentedon Dec 9, 2019
This looks good. We probably would still need to invent some way to denote things like "all resources including this shape". Perhaps that could be an extension of an asset collection.
michielbdejong commentedon Dec 9, 2019
CC @Mitzi-Laszlo
simonstey commentedon Jan 1, 2020
something along the lines of this?
ODRL Constraints would be replaced with SHACL shapes where all focus nodes passing the refinement node shape would serve as target to the permission.
coolharsh55 commentedon Sep 12, 2021
Of relevance is work by @besteves4 @vroddon and mysel - where the ODRL policy is used to express preferences for sharing categories of data for specific purposes. Example:
timbl commentedon Sep 13, 2021
How does ODRL fit with/compete with gConsent? gConsent has a concept of what purpose the information or access is going to be used for, which I think is important.
coolharsh55 commentedon Sep 13, 2021
GConsent (and others like DPV) can complement ODRL to express legal concepts of
PurposeandProcessing(e.g. EU/GDPR). ODRL'sActionconcept tells what is the operation, but not why it needs to happen (as you point out). To have ODRL express the purpose of action, possibilities are:ProcessingandPurposetogether into anAction. e.g. Collect for Service Provision whereCollectis processing operation andService Provisionis the purpose (missing item is data i.e.Collect <data> for ....which is anAssetin ODRL)Processingto be same/similar asActionand expressPurposeas part of a restriction on where that action can be applied. This is the approach taken in my earlier commentPurposein an ODRL rule or profile. Example is of this is in ODRL policy modelling and compliance checking by Vos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31095-0_3 ODRL example: https://github.com/instsuite/instsuite.github.io/blob/master/gdpr.ial