Repository navigation
refactor(config): Consolidate more config table definitions - #17480
Merged
Merged
Conversation
rustbot
added
A-cli
Collaborator
|
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
Member
Not sure what you meant by this, but there are other configs still scattering, like |
rustbot
enabled auto-merge
September 16, 2026 01:34
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
Author
Oops, I meant that I was aware of atm |
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2026
Update cargo submodule 9 commits in 7941be6fb416b4cd9666aef7b858dfea25587a8c..495c385d0875c4ba51eb72ea0448a2d4c018b8d4 2026-09-11 20:47:37 +0000 to 2026-09-16 12:48:58 +0000 - Report the number of errors with `build.warnings='deny'` (rust-lang/cargo#17479) - fix: return correct package specs when resolving workspace deps (rust-lang/cargo#17469) - refactor(config): Consolidate more config table definitions (rust-lang/cargo#17480) - fix(git): For git cli, tell users what config we aren't forwarding on error (rust-lang/cargo#17477) - Lower the lint level of `manual_readme` and `non_kebab_case_bins` to `allow` (rust-lang/cargo#17478) - fix(trim-paths)!: unremap file in one JSON doc (rust-lang/cargo#17476) - feat(manifest): support `feature-documentation` in manifests (rust-lang/cargo#17447) - chore: Add Muscraft to the review rotation (rust-lang/cargo#17471) - Specify `--edition` in `messages` tests (rust-lang/cargo#17470) r? Urgau for the debugger script part --- 🤖 LLM disclosure: I probably should have tested this change manually, though I let LLM verify it working, sorry. Will do a manual test when I have time or if somebody beats me on that.
pull Bot
pushed a commit
to LeeeeeeM/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2026
Update cargo submodule 9 commits in 7941be6fb416b4cd9666aef7b858dfea25587a8c..495c385d0875c4ba51eb72ea0448a2d4c018b8d4 2026-09-11 20:47:37 +0000 to 2026-09-16 12:48:58 +0000 - Report the number of errors with `build.warnings='deny'` (rust-lang/cargo#17479) - fix: return correct package specs when resolving workspace deps (rust-lang/cargo#17469) - refactor(config): Consolidate more config table definitions (rust-lang/cargo#17480) - fix(git): For git cli, tell users what config we aren't forwarding on error (rust-lang/cargo#17477) - Lower the lint level of `manual_readme` and `non_kebab_case_bins` to `allow` (rust-lang/cargo#17478) - fix(trim-paths)!: unremap file in one JSON doc (rust-lang/cargo#17476) - feat(manifest): support `feature-documentation` in manifests (rust-lang/cargo#17447) - chore: Add Muscraft to the review rotation (rust-lang/cargo#17471) - Specify `--edition` in `messages` tests (rust-lang/cargo#17470) r? Urgau for the debugger script part --- 🤖 LLM disclosure: I probably should have tested this change manually, though I let LLM verify it working, sorry. Will do a manual test when I have time or if somebody beats me on that.
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2026
Update cargo submodule 9 commits in 7941be6fb416b4cd9666aef7b858dfea25587a8c..495c385d0875c4ba51eb72ea0448a2d4c018b8d4 2026-09-11 20:47:37 +0000 to 2026-09-16 12:48:58 +0000 - Report the number of errors with `build.warnings='deny'` (rust-lang/cargo#17479) - fix: return correct package specs when resolving workspace deps (rust-lang/cargo#17469) - refactor(config): Consolidate more config table definitions (rust-lang/cargo#17480) - fix(git): For git cli, tell users what config we aren't forwarding on error (rust-lang/cargo#17477) - Lower the lint level of `manual_readme` and `non_kebab_case_bins` to `allow` (rust-lang/cargo#17478) - fix(trim-paths)!: unremap file in one JSON doc (rust-lang/cargo#17476) - feat(manifest): support `feature-documentation` in manifests (rust-lang/cargo#17447) - chore: Add Muscraft to the review rotation (rust-lang/cargo#17471) - Specify `--edition` in `messages` tests (rust-lang/cargo#17470) r? Urgau for the debugger script part --- 🤖 LLM disclosure: I probably should have tested this change manually, though I let LLM verify it working, sorry. Will do a manual test when I have time or if somebody beats me on that.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
Just another small step towards #12883
The only thing left afaik is
[unstable]which may not be worth pulling out.How to test and review this PR?
LLM Disclosure: Used it for "trivial" purpose of moving structs so imports would be updated. Manually inspected doc comments to ensure they did not get changed in the process