[RaghavChamadiya]

Every update re-mines recent PR and commit bodies. Each pass rewords the title and picks its own span, and the span decides the files and quote the decision id derives from, so a decision already stored came back under a new id. On this repository, 462 mined records held 187 decisions, with up to 11 copies of one sentence. Title dedup needs equal titles, the lane fold (#2753) pairs PR with commit lanes only, and semantic dedup needs an embedder, so none of them caught it.

What changed

• Ingest folds an incoming decision with no title match into a record of the same lane that cites a common evidence commit and says the same thing: one decision text opens the other, or their content words overlap at least 0.75 with the same negations. The stored id is kept, the new pass is added as evidence, and a rewording does not retitle the record. Shared evidence alone never folds, since one PR often states several decisions.
• Existing copies are folded by the id repair that runs at the start of every index, recording a merged alias so old ids still resolve.
• Survivor: an accepted record first, then one whose status a person set, then the oldest. Accepted, person-set and reviewed records are never folded away; needs_split bundles are left alone.

Measured on this repository's decisions

	Before	After
Mined records	462	187
Acceptable candidates	234	101

Kept apart: three distinct decisions from one commit, two tuning rules that share numbers, a bundled span vs one of its claims, and a negated ruling. Paraphrases with no shared wording are not merged.

Verification

• tests/unit/persistence/test_decision_reworded_duplicates.py (new, 30 cases from real duplicate clusters), plus test_decision_lane_fold.py fixtures corrected where two distinct decisions had copied text.
• Decision persistence suites: 375 passed. Goldens and analysis: 191 passed. Pipeline, CLI persist and MCP get_why: 391 passed.
• The id recipe is unchanged.

[repowise-bot]

Worth a look: 1 thing to check below.

1. This PR introduces 7 new health notes across 3 files: 5× untested complexity, 2× complex method (see all)

✅ Health of changed files: 7.7 → 8.0 (+0.3; structure +0.3) _{Average full file score (structure and history) of 6 changed code files, weighted by size before this PR; not the repository score.}

Patch coverage 95.4% (105 of 110 changed executable lines covered)

5 uncovered changed lines in 2 files

File	Uncovered changed lines	Covered
packages/core/src/repowise/core/persistence/crud/decision_lane_fold.py	270, 300, 308	42 of 45
packages/core/src/repowise/core/persistence/crud/decision_identity.py	105-106	11 of 13

Report from this run for 6ebd374. Every check on the PR page.

---

_{Plain markdown for agents · Reviews (2) · Last reviewed commit: fix(decisions): count quantity and contrast words when matching decision · Since the last review: 1 resolved (their code changed), 1 answered in its thread}

_{Settings and updates}

_{Silence one PR with [skip repowise] in the title · Bot settings
/repowise recheck reviews the current head again
/repowise review deep runs the deep review on it
/repowise remember <text> tells the reviewer what to leave out next time (reply on a finding to scope it to that file)
/repowise help lists the commands
⭐ Star Repowise · 📥 Install on another repo}