ParamSpec: No support for adding keyword-only argument #1009
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
topic: featureDiscussions about new features for Python's type annotationsDiscussions about new features for Python's type annotations
Description
I've been looking through PEP 612 but I just wasn't able to find any way to implement behavior that would allow me to do this:
P = ParamSpec("P")
R = TypeVar("R")
def foo(f: Callable[P, R]) -> Callable[P, List[R]]: # Here, the parameters are actually P + optional kw-only int x = 3
def inner(*args: P.args, x: int = 3, **kwargs: P.kwargs) -> List[R]:
results = []
for _ in range(x):
ret = f(*args, **kwargs)
results.append(ret)
return results
return inner
@foo
def bar(p: int):
return p + 2
bar(5) # Acceptable
bar(5, x=8) # Should also be AcceptableProposed solution:
Callable[[P.args, x: int = 3, P.kwargs], List[R]]EDIT: I didn't notice that this was already in rejected alternatives section (I didn't scroll that far), however I still think an implementation like this would be worth adding since I have already encountered the need for this twice and there's simply absolutely no way to handle it.
I'm fine with the proposed syntax suggestion of
Concatenate[("x", int), P]Though it didn't mention anything about default values, but those could just be handled by a third value in that tuple. It would probably be a lot easier to implement than my proposed suggestion, though to be fair, at least to me, my suggestion looks a bit cleaner.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
topic: featureDiscussions about new features for Python's type annotationsDiscussions about new features for Python's type annotations
Activity
rmorshea commentedon Sep 21, 2022
I've encountered this as well. In particular, I'm trying to recreate a decorator for a React-like framework in Python. I have a decorator that, given a user's function, returns a new function that accepts all the arguments of the one give, but with extra arguments that the decorator itself consumes and does not pass on. This would look a bit like this:
One point of note is that I need
(str | None, "key")to be a keyword-only arg. The syntax suggested in the PEP seems to concatenate a keyword or positional argument. Perhaps, placing it after theParamSpecin the concatenation could indicate a keyword-only argument?flying-sheep commentedon Feb 26, 2024
This is mentioned here: https://peps.python.org/pep-0612/#concatenating-keyword-parameters
But I think supporting this would open the door for typing a lot of powerful decorators that exist in the wild.
Fix run.cpu_bound/io_bound return type to R | None (zauberzeug#6056)