Skip to content

OSS governance show #47

Open
Open

Description

@rvagg

Perhaps it's time we had a governance model fistfight?

Representing radical openness: @mikeal & @rvagg

Representing BDFL: @hueniverse and maybe @isaacs

Representing ... ? What other camps could we pull in here?

Activity

  1. isaacs commented on Oct 23, 2014

    @isaacs

    Representing this as a "fistfight" is kind of disingenuous, I think. Like any complicated choice, there are cost/benefit tradeoffs with any governance model. The important thing is to understand the differences and choose the best fit for a project's scope, size, and maturity.

  2. isaacs commented on Oct 23, 2014

    @isaacs

    Or maybe that just means I should be the referee in this boxing match? ;)

  3. mikeal commented on Oct 23, 2014

    @mikeal

    I'm suppose to start doing a "First Sunday" of every month show that is about Node Forward activity. Perhaps this can be the first topic.

  4. dshaw commented on Oct 23, 2014

    @dshaw
    Member

    @mikeal Sounds great

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions