You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
Node.js Foundation Modules Team Meeting 2019-06-19 #342
The agenda comes from issues labelled with modules-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.
Also per the meeting, we need to put together a PR to update the docs to encourage package authors to always include the "type" field, for both ESM and CommonJS packages. This will touch upon our recommendation for dual packages and enabling ESM generally.
Activity
guybedford commentedon Jun 18, 2019
I've just removed the agenda label from the package.json "name" proposal. We can come back around on this in due course.
hybrist commentedon Jun 18, 2019
I'll try to make it to this meeting but I'm not sure yet if I can sneak out of the training sessions for it.
P.S.: 12:30 PT is start of a lunch break for me - could we move
package#exportsto the end?GeoffreyBooth commentedon Jun 19, 2019
#343
GeoffreyBooth commentedon Jun 19, 2019
Also per the meeting, we need to put together a PR to update the docs to encourage package authors to always include the
"type"field, for both ESM and CommonJS packages. This will touch upon our recommendation for dual packages and enabling ESM generally.doc: missing meeting notes
doc: explain esm options for package authors
doc: explain esm options for package authors
doc: explain esm options for package authors