Skip to content

Integrate ONNX Runtime for local model execution #61

Open

Description

@KSemenenko

Problem

The product needs a second local runtime path for models that fit an ONNX-based execution strategy.

Scope

  • Track CPU and GPU-capable ONNX Runtime integration at the product-contract level
  • Cover execution-provider visibility, compatibility, and operator-facing state
  • Keep the runtime aligned with the shared local session model

Out of scope

  • LLamaSharp implementation
  • Provider toolchain readiness for external CLIs

Implementation notes

  • Use ONNX Runtime as the approved local ONNX execution layer
  • Keep execution-provider reporting explicit
  • Align the issue with the model-vault and mixed-session flows

Definition of Done

  • The issue defines the ONNX runtime expectations clearly
  • Later implementation can proceed without ambiguity about product behavior

Verification

  • Review the issue against the local-runtime abstraction and model-vault issue

Dependencies

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions