Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 18, 2021. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 18, 2021. It is now read-only.

[Meta] clarify policy around collaborator status for this repo #1472

Open

Description

@aspiers

Hi there,

I would like to know if there is a possibility to add other collaborators to this repo? Yes, to be perfectly honest I am asking primarily for myself, since I have contributed quite a lot to this repo (57 issues at the time of writing, of which I submitted 27 myself), but there's a limit to how much I can contribute without having collaborator access. For example, I can't:

  • Add or amend labels on issues
  • Close issues which are resolved, unless I submitted them myself

However the question is not just for me: I'm sure there are other contributors out there who would be able to help make this repo even better if they had collaborator privileges.

I see from #430 and #459 that there has been some kind of process for adding collaborators in the past, but it would be nice if the policy around this was clarified, even if the policy is "we won't ever add any new collaborators, sorry".

Thanks for any clarification you can offer here!

Activity

  1. cirosantilli commented on Feb 4, 2019

    @cirosantilli
    Collaborator

    @isaacs hasn't replied in a while to at mentions, and no one else can add new people.

    The only solution is a side channel contact with him, try email or the contact form on his website or twitter.

    For the record, I support adding @aspiers as a collaborator.

  2. aspiers commented on Feb 4, 2019

    @aspiers
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Thanks a lot @cirosantilli. I'll see if I can reach @isaacs some other way.

  3. aspiers commented on Feb 21, 2019

    @aspiers
    CollaboratorAuthor

    I just emailed @isaacs about this.

  4. aspiers commented on Feb 22, 2019

    @aspiers
    CollaboratorAuthor

    @isaacs responded very quickly and has kindly made me and @TPS collaborators. Since this issue was mainly about the policy / process around changing collaborator status, I'll leave it open for now.

  5. TPS commented on Feb 25, 2019

    @TPS
    Collaborator

    I did close #619, though - that's specifically re: myself. 😊

  6. TPS commented on Feb 25, 2019

    @TPS
    Collaborator

    Also, is there anyplace there's a complete public list of collaborators, &/or a way to notify the whole group @isaacs/collaborators - style? I'd like to open perhaps some meta-issues to hammer things out between us (e.g., labeling or comment policy), or have users ping us.

  7. clarkbw commented on Feb 26, 2019

    @clarkbw
    Collaborator

    Also, is there anyplace there's a complete public list of collaborators, &/or a way to notify the whole group @isaacs/collaborators - style?

    No, that’s only visible in the settings and you need to be an admin for that tab. Also no way to notify this meta group, something that’s a good idea.

    I’m a collaborator as well. I also work at GitHub. ✨

  8. aspiers commented on Feb 27, 2019

    @aspiers
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Awesome to have you on board @clarkbw!

  9. TPS commented on Mar 1, 2019

    @TPS
    Collaborator

    Welcome, @clarkbw!

    @isaacs, other admins & all collaborators: Whaddy'all think of #792 & #1510, which are proposals for issue templates, containing policies, &c?

  10. TPS commented on Mar 10, 2019

    @TPS
    Collaborator

    What happened to #459?

    Also, should we do anything more w/ https://github.com/isaacs/github/community?

  11. TPS commented on Apr 22, 2019

    @TPS
    Collaborator

    I'd also love a discussion/overhaul re: the 94 (!) labels in this repo: IMHO, too many are overly specific or vague, which makes it a bit of a 🎱 [Magic 8-Ball] kinda choice to properly categorize issues. I've done a little work w/ them, but some collaboration might be more effective.

  12. clarkbw commented on Apr 23, 2019

    @clarkbw
    Collaborator

    Would be happy to audit the labels at some point. There are some names I’ve used like render which are internal to GitHub and need explanation to have meaning. I want the labels to be obvious and useful internally and externally.

  13. aspiers commented on Apr 23, 2019

    @aspiers
    CollaboratorAuthor

    @TPS @clarkbw Brilliant idea to have a labels overhaul! However it's off-topic for this issue, so I submitted #1549. Let's track it there.

    Regarding https://github.com/isaacs/github/community, again it's off-topic for this issue, but I suggest that we have one issue for each aspect which needs addressing. [EDIT]: here's a list - once a separate issue is filed for an item, let's tick the checkbox and link to it:

  14. TPS commented on Jun 7, 2019

    @TPS
    Collaborator

    @aspiers How about adding to above list (& then deleting this entire comment):

  15. aspiers commented on Jun 11, 2019

    @aspiers
    CollaboratorAuthor

    @TPS Good idea re locking! - I've added it to the list, and updated my comment above about how to use the list. I've also started filing more new issues. Would prefer not to delete your comment as it makes the history harder for others to follow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions