[associative.reqmts] Terribly formatted table #78

Activity

1. sdutoit commented on Apr 17, 2013

   

   sdutoit

   on Apr 17, 2013

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   For example "a_eq.insert(t)" -> "a_-\neq.insert(t)"
2. zygoloid

   assigned

   jyasskin

   on Jun 18, 2014
3. zygoloid commented on Jun 18, 2014

   

   zygoloid

   on Jun 18, 2014

   Member

   More actions

   Forwarded to LWG.
4. tkoeppe commented on Dec 5, 2015

   

   tkoeppe

   on Dec 5, 2015

   Contributor

   More actions

   Are there any requirement tables that don't have awful formatting? :-)

   I have an attempt here to re-layout the tables into paragraphs. I'm waiting for @zygoloid's response.
5. burblebee

   added

   lwgIssue must be reviewed by LWG.Issue must be reviewed by LWG.

   on Apr 15, 2016
6. jensmaurer

   added

   decision-requiredA decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required.A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required.

   on Dec 19, 2016
7. jensmaurer

   added this to the C++20This milestone has been deleted milestone on Mar 2, 2017
8. zygoloid commented on Mar 2, 2017

   

   zygoloid

   on Mar 2, 2017

   Member

   More actions

   Our preference is to move away from tables for requirements for C++20.
9. jensmaurer

   removed

   decision-requiredA decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required.A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required.

   on Mar 2, 2017
10. tkoeppe commented on Nov 7, 2017

    

    tkoeppe

    on Nov 7, 2017

    Contributor

    More actions

    Here is an example of a different way to present requirements. The example replaces Table 86 in [container.requirements.general]:

    

    The code lives in https://github.com/tkoeppe/draft/tree/table_to_paragraph

    👍React with 👍5Reacted by Jonathan Wakely, Jens Maurer, Casey Carter, timsong-cpp and S. B. Tam
11. tkoeppe

    unassigned

    jyasskin

    on Nov 7, 2017
12. jensmaurer commented on Nov 7, 2017

    

    jensmaurer

    on Nov 7, 2017

    Member

    More actions

    Editorial meeting consensus: Present Thomas' bulleted rewrite to LWG for comment.
13. mclow commented on Jan 2, 2018

    

    mclow

    on Jan 2, 2018

    Contributor

    More actions

    Sent to -lib reflector for feedback.
14. tkoeppe commented on Jul 2, 2018

    

    tkoeppe

    on Jul 2, 2018

    Contributor

    More actions

    I really hope we can make some progress with this for C++20. There's good guidance from @geoffromer on the reflector, @tkoeppe needs to do some work here.
15. tkoeppe

    self-assigned this

    on Jul 2, 2018
16. tkoeppe

    added

    bigAn issue causing a large set of changes, scattered across most of the text.An issue causing a large set of changes, scattered across most of the text.

    on Jul 2, 2018
17. geoffromer commented on Jul 2, 2018

    

    geoffromer

    on Jul 2, 2018

    Contributor

    More actions

    For reference, the reflector thread is http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2018/01/5041.php
18. cpplearner commented on Sep 9, 2019

    

    cpplearner

    on Sep 9, 2019

    Contributor

    More actions

    any update?
19. zygoloid commented on Mar 12, 2020

    

    zygoloid

    on Mar 12, 2020

    Member

    More actions

    Not happening for C++20. Retargeting.
20. zygoloid

    modified the milestones: C++20, C++23 on Mar 12, 2020
21. tkoeppe commented on Feb 18, 2021

    

    tkoeppe

    on Feb 18, 2021

    Contributor

    More actions

    Resumed by Jens's effort in #4460.
22. tkoeppe commented on Feb 22, 2022

    

    tkoeppe

    on Feb 22, 2022

    Contributor

    More actions

    @jensmaurer: I take it we can close this now? :-)
23. jensmaurer

    closed this as completedon Feb 22, 2022
24. jensmaurer commented on Feb 22, 2022

    

    jensmaurer

    on Feb 22, 2022

    Member

    More actions

    Yes. I've also added a link to the pull request.

    🎉React with 🎉1Reacted by Thomas Köppe