Repository navigation
Update github actions (main) (patch) - #3584
red-hat-konflux[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info
📝 Walkthrough
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to
|
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title refers to GitHub Actions updates, which matches the changes, but it does not identify the two actions or their version updates. |
| Description check | ✅ Passed | The description identifies both action version updates and includes relevant release notes and context. It does not use the template headings or provide a Tickets section, but it is mostly complete. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… |
| Linked Issues check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
✨ Finishing Touches
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
-
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
f0089ea to
34af133
Compare
|
<!-- fullsend:risk-assessment --> DetailsRoutine bot-authored patch bumps of four GitHub Actions across four CI workflow files; PROTECTED_PATH_COUNT=4 and CI_WORKFLOW_CHANGED elevate Tier 1, but these are offset by XS change size (4 files, 12 lines), zero security-sensitive touches, and bot authorship; elevated fix/revert history in benchmark.yaml and release.yaml adds modest Tier 2 risk, yielding an unchanged composite moderate score of 2. Previous runRisk Assessment: moderate (2/5) DetailsRoutine bot-authored patch bumps of three GitHub Actions across four CI workflow files; elevated PROTECTED_PATH_COUNT (4) and CI_WORKFLOW_CHANGED Tier 1 signals are offset by XS change size (4 files, 12 lines), zero security-sensitive file touches, bot authorship, and low Tier 2 churn, yielding a composite moderate score of 2 — consistent with prior assessments of this same PR character. Previous run (2)Risk Assessment: moderate (2/5) DetailsRoutine bot-authored patch bumps of three GitHub Actions across four CI workflow files; elevated Tier 1 signals from PROTECTED_PATH_COUNT and CI_WORKFLOW_CHANGED are offset by the bot author, XS change size, and zero security-sensitive file touches, yielding a composite moderate score of 2. Previous run (3)Risk Assessment: moderate (2/5) DetailsTiny patch-level Renovate PR (12 lines across 4 CI workflow files) by a trusted bot with SHA-pinned GitHub Actions bumps. Elevated signals come from touching protected .github/workflows paths (PROTECTED_PATH_COUNT=4, CI_WORKFLOW_CHANGED=true); other dimensions are minimal. Previous run (4)Risk Assessment: moderate (2/5) DetailsAutomated Renovate bot PR with a 12-line patch across four CI workflow files; protected-path (4) and CI-change signals elevate Tier 1, but tiny blast radius, bot authorship, no dependency changes, and low recent churn keep the composite at moderate — unchanged from the prior assessment of the same character. Previous run (5)Risk Assessment: moderate (2/5) DetailsAutomated bot PR making minimal 4-line changes to two CI workflow files; protected-path and CI-change signals elevate risk, but the tiny blast radius, bot authorship, and routine pin-update pattern keep the composite at moderate. Previous run (6)Risk Assessment: moderate (2/5) DetailsBot-authored XS patch-version SHA pin in two protected CI workflow paths; PROTECTED_PATH_COUNT and CI_WORKFLOW_CHANGED elevate Tier 1 to 1.875, while elevated fix/revert churn on benchmark.yaml pushes Tier 2 to 2.29, yielding a weighted composite of 2.03 — moderate, consistent with the prior assessment. Previous run (7)Risk Assessment: moderate (2/5) DetailsA bot-authored single-line SHA pin bump in a protected CI workflow path; the CI_WORKFLOW_CHANGED and protected-path signals elevate Tier 1, but the minimal change size, benign automation authorship, and broad historical author diversity across the file keep the composite at moderate. Previous run (8)Risk Assessment: moderate (2/5) DetailsRoutine bot-authored action version bump (1 file, 2 lines) in a high-churn, multi-author CI workflow file; CI_WORKFLOW_CHANGED elevates Tier 1 but small change size, bot authorship, and absence of recent regressions keep the composite moderate. |
ReviewFindingsHigh
Labels: PR modifies GitHub Actions workflow files Next steps:
<!-- fullsend:review-findings-v2:eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoyLCJmaW5kaW5ncyI6W119 --> Previous runReviewFindingsHigh
Labels: PR is a Renovate dependency update touching only GitHub Actions CI workflows Next steps:
<!-- fullsend:review-findings-v2:eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoyLCJmaW5kaW5ncyI6W119 --> Previous run (2)ReviewFindingsHigh
Next steps:
<!-- fullsend:review-findings-v2:eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoyLCJmaW5kaW5ncyI6W119 --> Previous run (3)ReviewFindingsHigh
Next steps:
<!-- fullsend:review-findings-v2:eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoyLCJmaW5kaW5ncyI6W119 --> Previous run (4)ReviewFindingsHigh
Next steps:
<!-- fullsend:review-findings-v2:eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoyLCJmaW5kaW5ncyI6W119 --> Previous run (5)ReviewFindingsMedium
<!-- fullsend:review-findings-v2:eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoyLCJmaW5kaW5ncyI6W119 --> Previous run (6)Looks good to me
<!-- fullsend:review-findings-v2:eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoyLCJmaW5kaW5ncyI6W119 --> Previous run (7)Looks good to me Previous run (8)ReviewRoutine Renovate SHA-pin bump of FindingsInfo
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
13e91d1 to
5b2ebbc
Compare
f06cb12 to
c4fa30f
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ❌ Failure (ensuring provider "vertex-ai": provider create "vertex-ai" failed: exit status 1 (output: Error: × code: 'Client specified an invalid argument', message: "provider │ credentials are not declared by pr…) · Started 2:01 AM UTC · Completed 2:01 AM UTC Commit: Effort: high |
c4fa30f to
483dfa7
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ❌ Failure (ensuring provider "github-ro": provider create "github-ro" failed: exit status 1 (output: Error: × code: 'Client specified an invalid argument', message: "provider │ credentials are not declared by pr…) · Started 2:08 AM UTC · Completed 2:09 AM UTC Commit: Effort: high |
483dfa7 to
2afa4cc
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ❌ Failure (ensuring provider "github-ro": provider create "github-ro" failed: exit status 1 (output: Error: × code: 'Client specified an invalid argument', message: "provider │ credentials are not declared by pr…) · Started 2:14 AM UTC · Completed 2:14 AM UTC Commit: Effort: high |
2afa4cc to
0e5b066
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ❌ Failure (ensuring provider "vertex-ai": provider create "vertex-ai" failed: exit status 1 (output: Error: × code: 'Client specified an invalid argument', message: "provider │ credentials are not declared by pr…) · Started 1:27 AM UTC · Completed 1:27 AM UTC Commit: Effort: high |
2084aaa to
75f5029
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ❌ Failure (ensuring provider "vertex-ai": provider create "vertex-ai" failed: exit status 1 (output: Error: × code: 'Client specified an invalid argument', message: "provider │ credentials are not declared by pr…) · Started 1:37 AM UTC · Completed 1:37 AM UTC Commit: Effort: high |
75f5029 to
3b13275
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ❌ Failure (ensuring provider "github-ro": provider create "github-ro" failed: exit status 1 (output: Error: × code: 'Client specified an invalid argument', message: "provider │ credentials are not declared by pr…) · Started 4:00 AM UTC · Completed 4:00 AM UTC Commit: Effort: high |
3b13275 to
6024fdd
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ❌ Failure (ensuring provider "github-ro": provider create "github-ro" failed: exit status 1 (output: Error: × code: 'Client specified an invalid argument', message: "provider │ credentials are not declared by pr…) · Started 1:46 AM UTC · Completed 1:46 AM UTC Commit: Effort: high |
8706e78 to
b8874fe
Compare
b8874fe to
7721b13
Compare
|
🤖 Finished Review · ❌ Failure (creating sandbox: sandbox creation failed after 3 attempts: sandbox create failed: signal: killed (output: )) · Started 2:09 AM UTC · Completed 2:15 AM UTC Commit: Effort: high |
7721b13 to
2f305f4
Compare
2f305f4 to
ba50158
Compare
d41301e to
a45544c
Compare
|
🤖 Review · Commit: |
a45544c to
76c4d69
Compare
76c4d69 to
3adb3b2
Compare
Signed-off-by: red-hat-konflux <126015336+red-hat-konflux[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
3adb3b2 to
105e39a
Compare
|
🤖 Review · Commit: |
This PR contains the following updates:
v4.38.2→v4.38.3v1.3.1→v1.3.2v2.0.1→v2.0.2Release Notes
github/codeql-action (github/codeql-action)
v4.38.3Compare Source
jlumbroso/free-disk-space (jlumbroso/free-disk-space)
v1.3.2: — security fix and the decision recordsCompare Source
Fixes the template-injection pattern in input handling (#51, by @nbuckwalt).
Also adds
docs/adr/— the reasoning behind this action: why it exists, what it inherited fromapache/flinkandShubhamTatvamasi, what it deliberately does not do, and what is still open.No behaviour changes. The
swap-storagedefault change ships in the next release.oras-project/setup-oras (oras-project/setup-oras)
v2.0.2Compare Source
Highlights
What's Changed
New Contributors
Full Changelog: oras-project/setup-oras@v2.0.1...v2.0.2
Configuration
📅 Schedule: (UTC)
* 0-3 * * *)🚦 Automerge: Enabled.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.
To execute skipped test pipelines write comment
/ok-to-test.Documentation
Find out how to configure dependency updates in MintMaker documentation or see all available configuration options in Renovate documentation.