You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's not difficult to implement in that way, but I'm afraid you won't get any big improvement in parsing time (now typical article processing time is 0.1-0.4 s per page), nor it's reliable, or, to be more precise:
If you use minScore check, readability algorithm is completely the same but without cleaning phase, will take almost the same time.
If you could only check HTML, it's completely unreliable.
The main check should be whether there's something to read: text with length starting from 300 chars. Ideally, 500+ chars.
You can check this after processinging with readability: just convert to text and check the length.
Activity
buriy commentedon May 27, 2022
It's not difficult to implement in that way, but I'm afraid you won't get any big improvement in parsing time (now typical article processing time is 0.1-0.4 s per page), nor it's reliable, or, to be more precise:
Uzay-G commentedon May 28, 2022
Oh I see. What could I do to use readability to check if a webpage actually has like interesting content?
Where an actual article passes this check and something like the google homepage doesn't.
buriy commentedon May 29, 2022
The main check should be whether there's something to read: text with length starting from 300 chars. Ideally, 500+ chars.
You can check this after processinging with readability: just convert to text and check the length.