Repository navigation
Is there any plan for standardizing local_shared_ptr? #106
Description
I'm sorry for bothering here. This is not an issue for boost::local_shared_ptr.
Arthur O'Dwyer said that local_shared_ptr has been rejected for standardization (on std-proposals). But it seems that there's not even a P-paper for it.
I wonder whether the standardization is really rejected, and if not, whether there is any plan for it.
Activity
pdimov commentedon Nov 29, 2022
I'm not aware of any attempts to propose
local_shared_ptrfor standardization. I'm not sure what Arthur was referring to. @Quuxplusone?Quuxplusone commentedon Nov 29, 2022
@pdimov: You think I remember what I was thinking in a parenthetical from two years ago? ;) Searching for "non-thread-safe shared_ptr" turns up some old discussions like
I might have been hazily remembering the 2015 and 2016 discussions, which were WG21-adjacent and didn't result in anything being adopted, but also weren't formal proposals either.
pdimov commentedon Nov 29, 2022
Reading that SO link reminds me that I need to find the time to implement local_weak_ptr one of these days.