Repository navigation
Description
Warning
For contributors, human or agent. Comment here to claim this issue and wait for the assignment before opening a PR; if two PRs show up, the assignee's stays. AI-assisted work is welcome, say so in the PR and tell us how you verified it: run the tests yourself and paste what you saw, do not describe runs you did not do. Read AGENTS.md first, it has the commands and the rules the CI enforces. This goes into 3.41.0.
Expected Behaviour
With a composite key (sort_key_attr set), DataRecord.idempotency_key is the record's own key, the value stored in the sort key, so the local cache, the response_hook and the IdempotencyAlreadyInProgressError message refer to the actual record.
Current Behaviour
DynamoDBPersistenceLayer._item_to_data_record sets idempotency_key=data[self.key_attr], which with a composite key is the static partition key value (static_pk_value, idempotency#<function> by default) for every record. So use_local_cache stores every record under one key and never hits for records written elsewhere, the response_hook receives idempotency_key='idempotency#myfn' (the docs example reads that field), and the in-progress error message shows the static value.
Code snippet
from aws_lambda_powertools.utilities.idempotency import DynamoDBPersistenceLayer
layer = DynamoDBPersistenceLayer(table_name="t", sort_key_attr="sk", static_pk_value="idempotency#fn")
record = layer._item_to_data_record(
{"id": {"S": "idempotency#fn"}, "sk": {"S": "fn#abc"}, "status": {"S": "COMPLETED"}, "expiration": {"N": "9999999999"}, "data": {"S": "{}"}},
)
record.idempotency_key # 'idempotency#fn', expected 'fn#abc'For the public-API test, use botocore.stub.Stubber on the layer's client like the existing composite-key tests do, and assert on what the response_hook receives.
Possible Solution
In aws_lambda_powertools/utilities/idempotency/persistence/dynamodb.py, _item_to_data_record: idempotency_key=data[self.sort_key_attr] if self.sort_key_attr else data[self.key_attr]. Add a test with sort_key_attr and a response_hook asserting the key, and one for the local cache hit.
Item 7 of the Idempotency audit in #8603. No AWS resources needed, the existing tests stub DynamoDB.
Powertools for AWS Lambda (Python) version
latest
AWS Lambda function runtime
3.13
Packaging format used
PyPi
Debugging logs
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
- StatusShow more project fieldsTriage
Activity
powertools-for-aws-oss-automation commentedon Oct 31, 2026
Note
For those interested in contributing, please leave a comment below so that we can assign the issue to you and make sure we don't duplicate efforts. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask below or on our Discord server.
sumedh-aerram commentedon Oct 31, 2026
Hi, I'd like to take this one. Plan: in
DynamoDBPersistenceLayer._item_to_data_record, use the sort key value asidempotency_keywhensort_key_attris set. I'll add Stubber-based functional tests for theresponse_hookkey and the local cache hit with a composite key, and confirm they fail ondevelop. I'm working with an AI assistant and will say so in the PR, along with the test output from my own runs.leandrodamascena commentedon Nov 1, 2026
@sumedh-aerram it's yours, assigning you now. Go ahead with the PR, and say in the description how you ran the tests.