Repository navigation
Conversation
Merging this PR will improve performance by ×9.3
|
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | WallTime | unzip_wheel_many_files |
371 ms | 12.3 ms | ×30 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | install_wheel_many_files |
385 ms | 13.5 ms | ×29 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | prepare_wheel_many_files |
383.4 ms | 14.9 ms | ×26 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | unpack_sdist_many_files |
317.2 ms | 36.6 ms | ×8.7 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | resolve_warm_jupyter_universal |
87.6 ms | 11.6 ms | ×7.5 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | resolve_warm_jupyter |
17.4 ms | 2.4 ms | ×7.2 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | discover_workspace_from_all_members_with_excludes |
52.7 ms | 8.3 ms | ×6.3 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | discover_workspace_from_all_members |
50.5 ms | 8 ms | ×6.3 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | run_python_version_synthetic_workspace |
268.4 ms | 42.6 ms | ×6.3 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | resolve_warm_airflow |
233.2 ms | 41.5 ms | ×5.6 |
| ⚡ | WallTime | hash_sha256 |
1,165.6 µs | 402.3 µs | ×2.9 |
Tip
Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing zb/bughunt200/122-pyodide-request (2605002) with main (b7c8c62)2
Footnotes
-
35 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
main(17cdcc3) during the generation of this report, so b7c8c62 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩
|
Promoted to #22322. |
Pyodide reports
cpythonas its implementation name, so an existing interpreter failspyodiderequests even though discovery accepts it. Use discovery's Emscripten-aware matcher when checking whether an interpreter satisfies an implementation request.