Skip to content

Seemingly random 'process crashed' for the instrumentation runner #352

Closed

Description

@tsaulic

Description

What appears to randomly process crashes of the test runner. I understand this may not be the best example on how to present the issue (without the full code), but I was unable to reproduce this on a fresh project :(

Steps to Reproduce

In our app, the test is really simple. When I run it from the IDE it runs almost 100% correctly, from command line via
./gradlew connectedProductionDebugAndroidTest -i

it often fails with the error provided below.

class MyTest {

    private val mockViewModel = mockk<FeedViewModel>(relaxed = true, relaxUnitFun = true)

    @get:Rule
    val mockInjectionRule = MockInjectionRule {
        every { it.myViewModel() } returns mockViewModel
        every { mockViewModel.shouldDoSomething() } returns false
    }

    @Test
    fun myFragment_titleDisplays() {
        launchFragmentInContainer(themeResId = R.style.AppTheme) { MyFragment() }

        onView(withText(R.string.title))
                .check(ViewAssertions.matches(isDisplayed()))
                .check(matches(withParent(withId(R.id.toolbar))))
        onView(withId(R.id.action_settings))
                .check(matches(isDisplayed()))
    }
}

Expected Results

Tests run/pass

Actual Results

Tests pass on average 7/10 times, when they fail, this is logged in Logcat

        ActivityManager  I  Start proc 23437:com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0/u0i50 for webview_service Ïd
                            ebug/org.chromium.content.app.SandboxedProcessService0
                         W  Slow operation: 57ms so far, now at startProcess: starting to update pids map
                         W  Slow operation: 57ms so far, now at startProcess: done updating pids map
         dboxed_process  W  Unexpected CPU variant for X86 using defaults: x86
         ercentral.debu  I  Background concurrent copying GC freed 161195(5MB) AllocSpace objects, 5(88KB) LOS objects, 36% free, 10MB/1
                            6MB, paused 1.468ms total 178.354ms
        ActivityManager  W  Slow operation: 70ms so far, now at attachApplicationLocked: after mServices.attachApplicationLocked
 cr_ChildProcessService  I  Creating new ChildProcessService pid=23437
        ActivityManager  I  Process com.examplepackage.debug (pid 23395) has died: fore TOP
                 Zygote  I  Process 23395 exited due to signal (11)
        InputDispatcher  W  channel '81514ff com.examplepackage.debug/androidx.fragment.app.testing.FragmentScenario$EmptyFragmen
                            tActivity (server)' ~ Consumer closed input channel or an error occurred.  events=0x9
                         E  channel '81514ff com.examplepackage.debug/androidx.fragment.app.testing.FragmentScenario$EmptyFragmen
                            tActivity (server)' ~ Channel is unrecoverably broken and will be disposed!
        libprocessgroup  W  kill(-23395, 9) failed: No such process
                         I  Successfully killed process cgroup uid 10097 pid 23395 in 4ms
 cr_ChildProcessService  I  Destroying ChildProcessService pid=23437
          WindowManager  I  WIN DEATH: Window{81514ff u0 com.examplepackage.debug/androidx.fragment.app.testing.FragmentScenario$
                            EmptyFragmentActivity}
                         D  HostConnection::get() New Host Connection established 0xe9c0a840, tid 1973
        InputDispatcher  W  Attempted to unregister already unregistered input channel '81514ff com.examplepackage.debug/androidx
                            .fragment.app.testing.FragmentScenario$EmptyFragmentActivity (server)'
         gralloc_ranchu  D  gralloc_unregister_buffer: exiting HostConnection (is buffer-handling thread)
         dboxed_process  I  System.exit called, status: 0
         AndroidRuntime  I  VM exiting with result code 0, cleanup skipped.
                         D  HostConnection::get() New Host Connection established 0xe9c0a840, tid 1973
         gralloc_ranchu  D  gralloc_unregister_buffer: exiting HostConnection (is buffer-handling thread)
                         D  HostConnection::get() New Host Connection established 0xe9c0a840, tid 1973
         gralloc_ranchu  D  gralloc_unregister_buffer: exiting HostConnection (is buffer-handling thread)
                 Zygote  I  Process 23437 exited cleanly (0)
                         D  HostConnection::get() New Host Connection established 0xe9c0a840, tid 1973
   GnssLocationProvider  I  WakeLock acquired by sendMessage(REPORT_SV_STATUS, 0, com.android.server.location.GnssLocationProvider$SvSta
                            tusInfo@453db8e)
         gralloc_ranchu  D  gralloc_unregister_buffer: exiting HostConnection (is buffer-handling thread)
   GnssLocationProvider  I  WakeLock released by handleMessage(REPORT_SV_STATUS, 0, com.android.server.location.GnssLocationProvider$SvS
                            tatusInfo@453db8e)
         SurfaceFlinger  W  couldn't log to binary event log: overflow.
        ActivityManager  W  Force removing ActivityRecord{82ebca5 u0 com.examplepackage.debug/androidx.fragment.app.testing.Fragm
                            entScenario$EmptyFragmentActivity t300}: app died, no saved state
                         W  Crash of app com.examplepackage.debug running instrumentation ComponentInfo{com.examplepackage
                            .debug.test/com.examplepackage.myapp.CustomTestRunner}
                         I  Force stopping com.examplepackage.debug appid=10097 user=0: finished inst

                            Process com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0 (PID: 23437) ended

        ActivityManager  I  Killing 23437:com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0/u0a97i50 (adj 0): isolated not needed
        libprocessgroup  W  Failed to open process cgroup uid 99050 pid 23437: No such file or directory
--
--
                         E  channel '81514ff com.examplepackage.debug/androidx.fragment.app.testing.FragmentScenario$EmptyFragmen
                            tActivity (server)' ~ Channel is unrecoverably broken and will be disposed!
        libprocessgroup  W  kill(-23395, 9) failed: No such process
                         I  Successfully killed process cgroup uid 10097 pid 23395 in 4ms
 cr_ChildProcessService  I  Destroying ChildProcessService pid=23437
          WindowManager  I  WIN DEATH: Window{81514ff u0 com.examplepackage.debug/androidx.fragment.app.testing.FragmentScenario$
                            EmptyFragmentActivity}

AndroidX Test and Android OS Versions

debugImplementation ("androidx.fragment:fragment-testing:1.1.0-alpha08") {
    exclude group: "androidx.test", module: "core"
}

androidTestImplementation 'androidx.test.ext:junit:1.1.1-beta01'
androidTestImplementation 'androidx.test:runner:1.1.1'
androidTestImplementation 'androidx.test:rules:1.1.1'
androidTestImplementation 'androidx.test.espresso:espresso-core:3.1.1'
androidTestImplementation 'androidx.test.espresso:espresso-contrib:3.1.1'
androidTestImplementation 'androidx.test.espresso:espresso-web:3.1.1'
androidTestImplementation 'androidx.test.espresso:espresso-intents:3.1.1'
androidTestImplementation "androidx.arch.core:core-testing:2.0.0"
androidTestUtil 'androidx.test:orchestrator:1.1.1'

Emulator is API 28 Nexus 5, animations turned off.

Link to a public git repo demonstrating the problem:

N/A

Activity

  1. brettchabot commented on May 17, 2019

    @brettchabot
    Collaborator

    Strange. Nothing in the posted stack trace gives me any clue to what might be wrong.

    Can you post a sample that reproduces this issue?

  2. tsaulic commented on May 19, 2019

    @tsaulic
    Author

    Strange. Nothing in the posted stack trace gives me any clue to what might be wrong.

    Can you post a sample that reproduces this issue?

    I'm trying to set up a minimal project where the same issue would occur consistently. Still no luck, but will post an update here if I succeed.

  3. navidRoohi commented on Aug 6, 2019

    @navidRoohi

    Any update about this issue? I m getting Test instrumentation process crashed., randomly. Adding a bit wait before starting the Test process solved it. but, I don't think is the right way.

  4. ruXlab commented on Oct 18, 2019

    @ruXlab

    Not sure if it can be related but by creating TestSubscriber even without using it increases chances for process to crash by ~80%, without - ~20%

    Same as topic starter I use mockk(1.9.3) and launchFragment(1.2.0)

  5. yuriykulikov commented on Oct 21, 2019

    @yuriykulikov

    Same here, also mockk 1.9.3 and launchFragment 1.2.0. Running clean before the test seems to solve the issue.

  6. tsaulic commented on Oct 22, 2019

    @tsaulic
    Author

    Same here, also mockk 1.9.3 and launchFragment 1.2.0. Running clean before the test seems to solve the issue.

    Thank you @yuriykulikov, mockk 1.9.3 works with 1.2.0-beta02 (as in - the tests run now). Just had to force objenesis version:

        allprojects {
            configurations.all {
                resolutionStrategy {
                    force("org.objenesis:objenesis:2.6")
                }
            }
        }
    

    But I still get process crashed randomly, unfortunately.

  7. brettchabot commented on Jan 30, 2020

    @brettchabot
    Collaborator

    closing due to lack of info

  8. joreilly commented on Feb 13, 2020

    @joreilly

    Also seeing this. Getting random crashes that we've narrowed down to use of mockk. Tried various combinations of versions but still happening

  9. TWiStErRob commented on Feb 13, 2020

    @TWiStErRob
    Contributor

    We;re seeing this and the last erroring logcat is suggesting an interplay of Jacoco, Garbage Collector (finalizers) and native. It happens after ~10 minutes of successful test executions. Failure rate is about 3-5%, so not possible to repro.

    02-11 09:58:09.992  2831  2842 I art     : Background partial concurrent mark sweep GC freed 15522(954KB) AllocSpace objects, 48(42MB) LOS objects, 5% free, 75MB/79MB, paused 3.303ms total 160.332ms
    02-11 09:58:10.141  2831  2842 W art     : Suspending all threads took: 6.671ms
    02-11 09:58:10.170  2831  2842 I art     : Background partial concurrent mark sweep GC freed 79588(5MB) AllocSpace objects, 59(91MB) LOS objects, 5% free, 70MB/74MB, paused 8.203ms total 155.791ms
    02-11 09:58:10.357  2831  2842 W art     : Suspending all threads took: 33.815ms
    02-11 09:58:10.375  2831  2839 W System.err: java.lang.Error: Cleaner terminated abnormally
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at sun.misc.Cleaner$1.run(Cleaner.java:147)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at sun.misc.Cleaner$1.run(Cleaner.java:145)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:41)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at sun.misc.Cleaner.clean(Cleaner.java:144)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.enqueueLocked(ReferenceQueue.java:75)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.enqueuePending(ReferenceQueue.java:243)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.lang.Daemons$ReferenceQueueDaemon.run(Daemons.java:160)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:761)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2842 I art     : Background partial concurrent mark sweep GC freed 24256(1469KB) AllocSpace objects, 63(92MB) LOS objects, 5% free, 63MB/67MB, paused 35.146ms total 191.839ms
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Attempted to free 98 native bytes with only 80 native bytes registered as allocated
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at dalvik.system.VMRuntime.registerNativeFree(Native Method)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at libcore.util.NativeAllocationRegistry.registerNativeFree(NativeAllocationRegistry.java:223)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at libcore.util.NativeAllocationRegistry.-wrap0(NativeAllocationRegistry.java)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at libcore.util.NativeAllocationRegistry$CleanerThunk.run(NativeAllocationRegistry.java:196)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at sun.misc.Cleaner.clean(Cleaner.java:142)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	... 4 more
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /jacoco.exec (Read-only file system)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at java.io.FileOutputStream.open(Native Method)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(FileOutputStream.java:221)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_8ff85ea.output.FileOutput.openFile(FileOutput.java:67)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_8ff85ea.output.FileOutput.writeExecutionData(FileOutput.java:53)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_8ff85ea.Agent.shutdown(Agent.java:137)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_8ff85ea.Agent$1.run(Agent.java:54)
    02-11 09:58:10.387  2831  2839 I art     : System.exit called, status: 1
    
  10. gosr commented on Jun 10, 2020

    @gosr

    Did anyone find a proper fix for this?

  11. NitroG42 commented on Jul 23, 2020

    @NitroG42

    Got exactly the same issue with multiple projects. I'm pretty sure this come from mockk from a way or another.
    Is there any way to have more info about process crashes when there are absolutly no stack trace in the logcat @brettchabot ?
    I'll try to work on a sample because after a few year I can't bear having my CI jobs failing each 1/2 time for no reason 😢

  12. ricard-v commented on Jul 24, 2020

    @ricard-v

    I have exactly the same issue and I also believe MockK could be behind it. I have posted the issue on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63059986/android-ui-tests-with-espresso-mockk-crash-with-sigsegv

    Looking at OP crash log, I found one common error message:

    channel '81514ff com.examplepackage.debug/androidx.fragment.app.testing.FragmentScenario$EmptyFragmentActivity (server)' ~ Channel is unrecoverably broken and will be disposed!

    In my case, this log message is always right before the crash, usually alongside a SIGSEGV.

    I am using Espresso to write a login + pwd to test a LoginActivity and I use MockK to mock all the Repositories / Services logic in a MVP architecture.
    Also, none of this has happened on my physical devices.

  13. NitroG42 commented on Jul 24, 2020

    @NitroG42

    I reproduced it on my system: https://github.com/NitroG42/CrashDuringTestSample
    I will make another issue.

  14. NitroG42 commented on Jul 24, 2020

    @NitroG42

    Or can this one with some infos be opened again @brettchabot ?

    EDIT: it does seems like the bug is coming from mockk after all but I wonder if there anything that can be done on the testing/emulator part.

  15. 4 remaining items

  16. BSuder commented on Oct 13, 2020

    @BSuder

    Same here, also mockk 1.9.3 and launchFragment 1.2.0. Running clean before the test seems to solve the issue.

    What type of cleaning you mean? Clean cache or clean user data?

  17. kmenesesp commented on Dec 4, 2020

    @kmenesesp

    I am facing exactly the same issue on a project I am working on. Have you found anything?

  18. BSuder commented on Dec 4, 2020

    @BSuder

    I have not solve the problem yet, but meybe it hass been caused memmory leaks.

  19. kmenesesp commented on Dec 4, 2020

    @kmenesesp

    Using an x64 emulator solved the problem for me, as cristan commented here: mockk/mockk#466 (comment)

  20. prfarlow1 commented on Dec 11, 2020

    @prfarlow1

    My project uses mockk, and using an x86_64 emulator (API 28+) also solved the problem for me, too mockk/mockk#466 (comment)
    mockK 1.10.0 and mockK Android 1.9.3 with objenesis forced at 2.6. I hope the Androidx test team can fix this bug. In Firebase Test Lab, you can't specify the ABI of the emulators used, so it appears basically impossible to run your UI tests in Firebase Test Lab on emulators if you use mockK or mockito

  21. prfarlow1 commented on Dec 16, 2020

    @prfarlow1

    Follow up: I also tried removing mockk as an android test dependency and removed all tests that used it. Once I did that, I found that I could once again run UI tests on non 64 bit emulators

    When I do run my tests on a non x86_64 bit emulator using mockk version 1.10.3-jdk8, I notice this log in logcat:

    2020-12-16 18:55:46.423 com.my.package.dev. W/.android.dev.q: DexFile /data/user/0/com.my.package.dev/cache/mockk-boot3284438913886633948.jar is in boot class path but is not in a known location
    
  22. dimgarof commented on Jan 13, 2021

    @dimgarof

    Using an x86_64 emulator also solved the issue for me.
    Anyone knows why is this fix working?

  23. pl9ed commented on Mar 30, 2021

    @pl9ed

    We;re seeing this and the last erroring logcat is suggesting an interplay of Jacoco, Garbage Collector (finalizers) and native. It happens after ~10 minutes of successful test executions. Failure rate is about 3-5%, so not possible to repro.

    02-11 09:58:09.992  2831  2842 I art     : Background partial concurrent mark sweep GC freed 15522(954KB) AllocSpace objects, 48(42MB) LOS objects, 5% free, 75MB/79MB, paused 3.303ms total 160.332ms
    02-11 09:58:10.141  2831  2842 W art     : Suspending all threads took: 6.671ms
    02-11 09:58:10.170  2831  2842 I art     : Background partial concurrent mark sweep GC freed 79588(5MB) AllocSpace objects, 59(91MB) LOS objects, 5% free, 70MB/74MB, paused 8.203ms total 155.791ms
    02-11 09:58:10.357  2831  2842 W art     : Suspending all threads took: 33.815ms
    02-11 09:58:10.375  2831  2839 W System.err: java.lang.Error: Cleaner terminated abnormally
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at sun.misc.Cleaner$1.run(Cleaner.java:147)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at sun.misc.Cleaner$1.run(Cleaner.java:145)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:41)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at sun.misc.Cleaner.clean(Cleaner.java:144)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.enqueueLocked(ReferenceQueue.java:75)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.enqueuePending(ReferenceQueue.java:243)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.lang.Daemons$ReferenceQueueDaemon.run(Daemons.java:160)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:761)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2842 I art     : Background partial concurrent mark sweep GC freed 24256(1469KB) AllocSpace objects, 63(92MB) LOS objects, 5% free, 63MB/67MB, paused 35.146ms total 191.839ms
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Attempted to free 98 native bytes with only 80 native bytes registered as allocated
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at dalvik.system.VMRuntime.registerNativeFree(Native Method)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at libcore.util.NativeAllocationRegistry.registerNativeFree(NativeAllocationRegistry.java:223)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at libcore.util.NativeAllocationRegistry.-wrap0(NativeAllocationRegistry.java)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at libcore.util.NativeAllocationRegistry$CleanerThunk.run(NativeAllocationRegistry.java:196)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	at sun.misc.Cleaner.clean(Cleaner.java:142)
    02-11 09:58:10.376  2831  2839 W System.err: 	... 4 more
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /jacoco.exec (Read-only file system)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at java.io.FileOutputStream.open(Native Method)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(FileOutputStream.java:221)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_8ff85ea.output.FileOutput.openFile(FileOutput.java:67)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_8ff85ea.output.FileOutput.writeExecutionData(FileOutput.java:53)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_8ff85ea.Agent.shutdown(Agent.java:137)
    02-11 09:58:10.378  2831 11893 W System.err: 	at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_8ff85ea.Agent$1.run(Agent.java:54)
    02-11 09:58:10.387  2831  2839 I art     : System.exit called, status: 1
    

    Did you ever figure out what was causing this / find a workaround? I'm seeing the same exception when running instrumented tests on physical devices.

  24. prfarlow1 commented on Aug 12, 2021

    @prfarlow1

    I agree with @NitroG42 .

    I have migrated the few UI tests I had written to on a new mobile app project Mockito believing it would be way more stable thanks to its history and active development.

    At first, it seemed the crashs were completely gone, but at some point they did reappear, still at random with the dreadful message from InputDispatcher and occasional SIGSEGV.

    On the Android TV project we have (which is way more advanced), the handful tests I developped, which required a lot more mocking, tended to crash a lot more (still on the emulator).

    When migrating to Mockito, I noticed the same issues and restrictions:

    • minimum API 28 (Android P)
    • "the mocking agent could not be attached to the JVMTI" -> added android:extractNativeLibs="true" as a workaround in the test manifest
    • attempting to run on lower API printed the same logs than MockK.

    So, if I understand correctly, MockK & Mockito uses the same APIs (from Android Test Instrumentation?) to perform mocking in Android UI tests.

    While Mockito seemed, at first, a lot more stable, the crash eventually did reappear, for the same reasons. Could it be possible neither of them are the culprit?

    Finally, I noticed that manually rebooting the emulators greatly reduced the random crash. Surely because it resets all the memory allocations, right?

    @brettchabot could you help? Do you have any idea what could be the real issue?

    @ricard-v one year later, any update on this? I'm still stuck on this bug, which prevents me from running any UI tests that use mocking in Firebase Test Lab. Wondering if I just need to bite the bullet and removing all mockking libraries if I want my instrumentation tests to run on FTL virtual devices.

  25. brettchabot commented on Aug 12, 2021

    @brettchabot
    Collaborator

    Sorry for the lack of response on this issue. I wish I could help more but TBH I don't have expertise on mocking libraries . This github project probably isn't the right forum to address this issue, as it doesn't seem to be related to the androidx.test libraries.

    Perhaps the mockk/mockito maintainers or Android ART team could be more help?

  26. prfarlow1 commented on Aug 12, 2021

    @prfarlow1

    Apologies, I should have commented in the mockk repository. Here's the corresponding issue mockk/mockk#466

  27. SimonMarquis commented on Aug 17, 2022

    @SimonMarquis

    Since this issue is still open, I'll share my minimal reproducible example: https://github.com/SimonMarquis/FTL-segfault
    I've also added more details in mockk/mockk#466 (comment)
    I hope this will be helpful.

  28. grndvl1 commented on Jul 25, 2025

    @grndvl1

    Still open and still happening 3 yrs later. Wish that when it crashes it spits out more info like Heap space...crash report...

  29. brettchabot commented on Jul 25, 2025

    @brettchabot
    Collaborator

    As mentioned in the previous comment I don't think this issue is actionable by the androidx.test maintainers #352 (comment) this does

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions