Create Intro to BDDfy Webcast #198

Activity

1. JakeGinnivan

   added

   question

   on Apr 6, 2015
2. mwhelan commented on Apr 6, 2015

   

   mwhelan

   on Apr 6, 2015

   Member

   More actions

   That would be awesome!
3. JakeGinnivan commented on Apr 6, 2015

   

   JakeGinnivan

   on Apr 6, 2015

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   i was thinking a three part series.

   1. Intro to BDDfy, the Fluent Syntax and reporting
   2. Introduction to the class per test approach
   3. Examples

   The reason for the fluent being in the intro is that it is easy to show it fits inside an existing test framework?

   I am happy to do part 1 and 3 if we did this format. Any other ideas for structure?
4. mwhelan commented on Apr 6, 2015

   

   mwhelan

   on Apr 6, 2015

   Member

   More actions

   Sounds like you are one or two modules away from a Pluralsight....? :-)

   On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Jake Ginnivan notifications@github.com
   wrote:

   i was thinking a three part series.

   1. Intro to BDDfy, the Fluent Syntax and reporting
   2. Introduction to the class per test approach
   3. Examples

   The reason for the fluent being in the intro is that it is easy to show it
   fits inside an existing test framework?

   I am happy to do part 1 and 3 if we did this format. Any other ideas for
   structure?

   —
   Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
   #198 (comment)
   .
5. JakeGinnivan commented on Apr 6, 2015

   

   JakeGinnivan

   on Apr 6, 2015

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   Heh, these would be < 5 minutes each. Nothing in depth. Also for this it needs to be public and easy to get to. How does that structure sound?
6. mwhelan commented on Apr 6, 2015

   

   mwhelan

   on Apr 6, 2015

   Member

   More actions

   sounds good. Might want to compare it to the "Using BDDfy" part of of our
   BDDfy in Action series that Mehdi did...

   http://www.michael-whelan.net/bddfy-in-action/

   On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Jake Ginnivan notifications@github.com
   wrote:

   Heh, these would be < 5 minutes each. Nothing in depth. Also for this it
   needs to be public and easy to get to. How does that structure sound?

   —
   Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
   #198 (comment)
   .
7. MehdiK commented on Apr 7, 2015

   

   MehdiK

   on Apr 7, 2015

   Member

   More actions

   That sounds great Jake. Godspeed
   On 06/04/2015 11:51 PM, "Jake Ginnivan" notifications@github.com wrote:

   i was thinking a three part series.

   1. Intro to BDDfy, the Fluent Syntax and reporting
   2. Introduction to the class per test approach
   3. Examples

   The reason for the fluent being in the intro is that it is easy to show it
   fits inside an existing test framework?

   I am happy to do part 1 and 3 if we did this format. Any other ideas for
   structure?

   —
   Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
   #198 (comment)
   .
8. JakeGinnivan commented on Apr 7, 2015

   

   JakeGinnivan

   on Apr 7, 2015

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   So:

   1. Intro to BDDfy, the Fluent Syntax and reporting

   • Why/history:
     - Runs in any test framework
     - No separate test runner
     - Code first
     - Easy for those unfamiliar with BDD
     - Extensible/flexible
   • Fluent Syntax
     • First option of 2 syntaxes, other is class per test. See second video for that
     • Simple example
   • Reporting
     • Explain test runners see text reporter
     • Show html reporter

   Thoughts on that basic agenda?

   @mwhelan you want to do part 2?
9. mwhelan commented on Apr 7, 2015

   

   mwhelan

   on Apr 7, 2015

   Member

   More actions

   The agenda looks goods