Skip to content

Ability to have "Display Name" which is different from username. #1209

Closed

Description

@Theaxiom

This is especially helpful if you are utilizing a corporate LDAP/Active Directory which is setting your username to some obscure alphanumeric combination.

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

Activity

  1. johnhug commented on Oct 22, 2015

    @johnhug

    +1

  2. pioneer903 commented on Oct 22, 2015

    @pioneer903

    +1 please

  3. yonkeltron commented on Oct 22, 2015

    @yonkeltron

    +1 👍

  4. graywolf336 commented on Oct 22, 2015

    @graywolf336
    Contributor

    Would the display name only be for display or would there be any additional uses for it?

  5. graywolf336 commented on Oct 22, 2015

    @graywolf336
    Contributor

    Right now when you register, not sure about ldap, you set your name. Thereafter there was no way to actually change your name and so it was kind of useless. I just opened a pull request, #1211, which adds a field to the account profile where you can change that.

    I'm wondering if there should be an option per user or site wide which sets whether the username or the _(real)_name is used on the messages list.

  6. Theaxiom commented on Oct 23, 2015

    @Theaxiom
    Author

    @graywolf336 Thank you. :) I think you should be able to reference the display-name and it will auto-complete to the username when doing an @search in chat.

  7. graywolf336 commented on Oct 23, 2015

    @graywolf336
    Contributor

    @Theaxiom I think it currently does search on the display-name (real name, name) when you go to mention someone.

  8. Theaxiom commented on Oct 23, 2015

    @Theaxiom
    Author

    @graywolf336 You are absolutely correct, I believe it should be possible to show display names in channel instead of usernames. How feasible is this?

  9. graywolf336 commented on Oct 23, 2015

    @graywolf336
    Contributor

    @Theaxiom Great question, I have not looked into that. I don't imagine it being extremely difficult though.

  10. engelgabriel commented on Oct 25, 2015

    @engelgabriel
    Member

    This is a very tricky one, and we may have other old issue about the same feature.

    The big thing here is: performance and scalability. Our data model is denormalized in favor of really high performance with low CPU and Memory usage. So we don't have the real names available on every message, as we have the username copied.

    But we do understand that in small team, with less than 1k users, we could have a memory map for the real names, and that's what we will do. We will create an setting to turn that on, and recommend that large deployments keep that turn of.

  11. richardwlu commented on Nov 23, 2015

    @richardwlu

    👍

  12. LeCoupa commented on Dec 1, 2015

    @LeCoupa

    👍

  13. noregard commented on Dec 11, 2015

    @noregard

    👍

  14. 58 remaining items

  15. rajsardhara commented on Feb 13, 2017

    @rajsardhara

    +1

  16. MarIfla commented on Feb 14, 2017

    @MarIfla

    +1

  17. danielluchetta commented on Feb 20, 2017

    @danielluchetta

    +1

  18. sychevsky commented on Mar 27, 2017

    @sychevsky

    +1

  19. modified the milestones: Short-term, 0.55.0 on Apr 6, 2017
  20. dmanchev commented on May 19, 2017

    @dmanchev

    Yes please, this is important to have!

  21. rajsardhara commented on May 19, 2017

    @rajsardhara

    @dmanchev This is closed already Follow this to enable:
    Under message section : Set a user name to alias in message = "True"

  22. banholzer commented on Apr 19, 2018

    @banholzer

    this works in messages but does this also work in "roster" ?

  23. fletc3her commented on May 15, 2019

    @fletc3her

    I'd really appreciate this. People choose bizarre usernames. It would be nice if we could tell who everybody was.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions