Skip to content

Merge PMArbitraryPrecisionFloatForTrigonometry with PMArbitraryPrecisionFloat #197

Open

Description

@SergeStinckwich

@nicolas-cellier-aka-nice why do we need a separate class only for sin, cos and pi for arbitrary precision floatPMArbitraryPrecisionFloatForTrigonometry? I think we can merge with PMArbitraryPrecisionFloat to avoid confusion.

Activity

  1. nicolas-cellier-aka-nice commented on Feb 28, 2021

    @nicolas-cellier-aka-nice
    Contributor

    Yes, good idea, the only thing to care of is the precision of pi used in the subclass.

  2. SergeStinckwich commented on Feb 28, 2021

    @SergeStinckwich
    MemberAuthor

    Do you mind to do a PR with this modification? Thank you.

  3. nicolas-cellier-aka-nice commented on Feb 28, 2021

    @nicolas-cellier-aka-nice
    Contributor

    I've implemented upstream, see issue #199

  4. SergeStinckwich commented on Feb 28, 2021

    @SergeStinckwich
    MemberAuthor

    ok thank you. I have to see how to see the changes between the upstream and the PM version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions