Skip to content

os2web_key - #13

Merged
rimi-itk merged 11 commits into
OS2web:mainfrom
itk-dev:feature/os2web_key
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

rimi-itk merged 11 commits into
OS2web:mainfrom
itk-dev:feature/os2web_key

Conversation

@rimi-itk

@rimi-itk rimi-itk commented May 1, 2024 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rimi-itk
rimi-itk marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2024 15:12
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk marked this pull request as draft May 1, 2024 15:13
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk force-pushed the feature/os2web_key branch 2 times, most recently from 5368531 to e88cbe5 Compare May 1, 2024 15:27
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2024 11:30
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk requested a review from jekuaitk May 15, 2024 07:45
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk force-pushed the feature/os2web_key branch 2 times, most recently from 51bd586 to 2ca5bd7 Compare December 20, 2024 14:09
rimi-itk added 7 commits May 2, 2025 14:27
# Conflicts:
#	src/Plugin/os2web/DataLookup/DataLookupBase.php
#	src/Plugin/os2web/DataLookup/DatafordelerBase.php
#	src/Plugin/os2web/DataLookup/DatafordelerCVR.php
#	src/Plugin/os2web/DataLookup/DatafordelerPNumber.php
#	src/Plugin/os2web/DataLookup/ServiceplatformenBase.php
#	src/Plugin/os2web/DataLookup/ServiceplatformenCPR.php
#	src/Plugin/os2web/DataLookup/ServiceplatformenCPRExtended.php
# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk force-pushed the feature/os2web_key branch from 2ca5bd7 to d28b14f Compare May 2, 2025 12:29
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk changed the base branch from 8.x to main May 2, 2025 12:29
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk requested review from jekuaitk and stankut June 17, 2025 20:47
@stankut

stankut commented Jun 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rimi-itk looks good to me!

@rimi-itk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@stankut @jekuaitk, when merging this, should we go for a major (i.e. 3.0.0) or a minor release (2.1.0)? We won't break anything (hopefully).

@jekuaitk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stankut @jekuaitk, when merging this, should we go for a major (i.e. 3.0.0) or a minor release (2.1.0)? We won't break anything (hopefully).

As everything should be backwards compatible i vote 2.1.0.

@stankut

stankut commented Jun 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

i suggest to go for the major version if possible.

we are using this package in other projects as well. Would be nice to differenciate.

@rimi-itk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

We'll go for a major release – better safe than sorry. And a major release signals that care must be taken when upgrading (eventhough nothing has to be done).

@rimi-itk
rimi-itk merged commit 7e35a12 into OS2web:main Jun 18, 2025
@rimi-itk
rimi-itk deleted the feature/os2web_key branch June 18, 2025 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants