Skip to content

[auth_oidc] URL endpoints should be autodetected via OpenId Connect Discovery #765

Open

Description

@OdyX

Is your feature request related to a problem?
No. It's only that the manual setting of the 4 (or 5) URLs is cumbersome, error-prone and can be circumvented.

Describe the solution you'd like

The configuration should ask for the "Issuer URL", and rely on the "OpenID Connect Discovery 1.0" protocol to find all other URLs (via .well-known/openid-configuration).

It should be possible to support both the "one URL" and "customize every URL" modes.

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Aug 24, 2025

    @github-actions

    There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
    If you want this issue to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

  2. added
    stalePR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
    on Aug 24, 2025
  3. OdyX commented on Aug 25, 2025

    @OdyX
    Author

    It is stale, but it's valid. Please mark this "no stale".

  4. removed
    stalePR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
    on Aug 31, 2025
  5. github-actions commented on Mar 1, 2026

    @github-actions

    There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
    If you want this issue to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

  6. added
    stalePR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
    on Mar 1, 2026
  7. OdyX commented on Mar 1, 2026

    @OdyX
    Author

    It is stale, but it's valid. Please mark this "no stale".

  8. removed
    stalePR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
    on Mar 8, 2026
  9. github-actions commented on Sep 6, 2026

    @github-actions

    There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
    If you want this issue to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

  10. added
    stalePR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
    on Sep 6, 2026
  11. OdyX commented on Sep 8, 2026

    @OdyX
    Author

    It is stale, but it's valid. Please mark this "no stale".

  12. added
    no staleUse this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue.
    and removed
    stalePR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
    on Sep 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementno staleUse this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions