TP_A_EU868_ED_MAC_104_RETRANSMISSION_BACKOFF fails due to violation of duty cycle restrictions #129

Activity

1. sca-l commented on Jul 18, 2025

   

   sca-l

   on Jul 18, 2025

   Author

   More actions

   FAIL_TP_A_EU868_ED_MAC_104_RETRANSMISSION_BACKOFF.zip
2. lbm-team commented on Sep 8, 2025

   

   lbm-team

   on Sep 8, 2025

   Contributor

   More actions

   Hello,

   Have you disabled the certification mode to run this test ? else the Join duty-cycle constraint is not honored.

   The regional duty-cycle is not required for AS923.

   This test, only check the join-request backoff duty-cycle, it's to be sure the device does not try to join infinitely if not registered on a network for example.

   Best
3. sca-l commented on Oct 9, 2025

   

   sca-l

   on Oct 9, 2025

   Last edited by sca-l

   Author

   More actions

   Hello,

   I didn't disable the certification mode, but this should not impact the backoff test.
   The test steps are only related to join and to count the join requests. No commands to disable Duty Cycle is sent by TCL.
   Why do you refer to Certification mode?

   Could I see the LCTT logs related to the Backoff test for LBM, please? Just to see what I should expect. Thanks.

   Instead, looking the RP02-1.0.4 Specification Table 2: Dynamic channel plan summary, the AS923 has the same indication of RU864 and EU868 for Duty Cycle <1%, so in my understanding the Duty Cycle limitation should be implemented also for AS923.
   Why do you think it should not be done?

   

   Thank you, regards,
   Laura
4. sca-l commented on Nov 4, 2025

   

   sca-l

   on Nov 4, 2025

   Author

   More actions

   Hello,

   Seems also that there is logic to consider the Duty Cycle periods of 1h, 10h and 24h. Seems it is implemented only to cover the 1h period. Any comments on that please?

   Thank you, regards,
   Laura