You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Proposal: Room owner addition/deletion should be voted for #1
I think any votes should be longer than 24 hours (not just RO status votes). You (Kendall) and I are here daily.. not all RO's share that privilege. I would think a minimum of 72 hours would be fair.
This is what I'm currently fucked off about. @MadaraUchiha wanted to remove me and @mosho anyways, that's fine, he has the power. But @ralt just did it with no discussion and that was a dick move.
I really hope no one takes personal offense during these discussions. I don't think owners should be based on personal problems we may or may not have had (speaking in general) rather on how they will actually use the owner tools to keep the room moving forward .. ugh .. peacefully(?).
If I'm completely off base on 'owner responsibilities' then someone please correct me.
Activity
kendfrey commentedon Jan 19, 2016
How will this be done? Via an issue on this repo, with 24h to vote?
MadaraUchiha commentedon Jan 19, 2016
@kendfrey SGTM 👍
AmaanC commentedon Jan 19, 2016
Sounds good.
I'm for listening to the majority of votes. No veto privileges or anything of that sort.
Also +1 to doing it on this repo.
rlemon commentedon Jan 19, 2016
I think any votes should be longer than 24 hours (not just RO status votes). You (Kendall) and I are here daily.. not all RO's share that privilege. I would think a minimum of 72 hours would be fair.
Cerbrus commentedon Jan 19, 2016
Votes in favor Also, what @rlemon said.
Canop commentedon Jan 19, 2016
Note that not all RO want to vote. Some just want to follow what happens
benjamingr commentedon Jan 19, 2016
👍 for votes being more than 24 hours. 72 hours sound good. I also would like to suggest that the voting thread is pinned in the room for the duration.
Deathspike commentedon Jan 19, 2016
+1
Minimum threshold of >= 50% of current RO for addition/removal (based on actual votes in favor or against, non-votes are not counted)?
loktar00 commentedon Jan 19, 2016
@Deathspike sounds perfect.
RUJodan commentedon Jan 19, 2016
Agreed on 72 hours and pin.
benjamingr commentedon Jan 19, 2016
Ok, so it doesn't look like @rlemon or @Deathspike 's proposals got any objections and personally I agree with both.
Are we all cool with:
?
Deathspike commentedon Jan 19, 2016
👍
rlemon commentedon Jan 19, 2016
I think we need to also consider non-RO's votes. but we can open a new issue to work that out.
kendfrey commentedon Jan 19, 2016
9e3ca85
benjamingr commentedon Jan 19, 2016
Thanks @kendfrey I wonder if it should be left open to discuss when other ROs show up - we literally just agreed that that can take 72 hours.
phenomnomnominal commentedon Jan 19, 2016
This is what I'm currently fucked off about. @MadaraUchiha wanted to remove me and @mosho anyways, that's fine, he has the power. But @ralt just did it with no discussion and that was a dick move.
darkyen commentedon Jan 19, 2016
+1
rlemon commentedon Jan 20, 2016
I really hope no one takes personal offense during these discussions. I don't think owners should be based on personal problems we may or may not have had (speaking in general) rather on how they will actually use the owner tools to keep the room moving forward .. ugh .. peacefully(?).
If I'm completely off base on 'owner responsibilities' then someone please correct me.