Skip to content

Integrate DoubleVerify Support into TS #56

Open

Description

@aram356

Description

Determine the Trusted Server integration contract for DoubleVerify and implement the agreed path. The original issue had only a title; its discussion records a plan to follow up with the vendor, but does not specify a product, endpoint, credentials, or which traffic should be evaluated. Those choices must be made before code changes are scoped.

Proposed scope

  • Confirm the vendor contact and document the supported use case, required request/response data, authentication, and decision point in the ad-serving flow.
  • Identify which Trusted Server serving paths can supply that data and how failures, latency, and consent should be handled.
  • Implement only the agreed integration surface, with configuration, observable outcomes, and operator instructions.

Done when

  • The vendor/product contract and Trusted Server behavior are recorded in a reviewable integration spec, including failure and privacy handling.
  • The agreed path works in a representative end-to-end test or vendor sandbox, with success and failure cases covered.
  • Deployment configuration and operational limits are documented, or the issue is closed with the reason integration is out of scope.

Related

The May 2026 issue comment records vendor follow-up; it is not evidence that an integration contract was agreed.

Activity

  1. added theissue type on Oct 22, 2025
  2. changed the title [-]Integrate DoubleVerify Support into TS[/-] [+]Epic: Integrate DoubleVerify Support into TS[/+] on Oct 22, 2025
  3. changed the issue type fromtoon Oct 22, 2025
  4. changed the title [-]Epic: Integrate DoubleVerify Support into TS[/-] [+]Integrate DoubleVerify Support into TS[/+] on Oct 23, 2025
  5. jevansnyc commented on May 19, 2026

    @jevansnyc
    Collaborator

    @iabshailley lets follow up with them at Summit and set a time to chat if we can

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions