should we use jsbin instead of jsfiddle? #2

Activity

2. mainerror commented on May 6, 2013

   

   mainerror

   on May 6, 2013

   Member

   More actions

   I don't mind, whatever you are more comfortable with.
3. ghost assigned

   Wes1262

   on May 6, 2013
4. DaveRandom commented on May 7, 2013

   

   DaveRandom

   on May 7, 2013

   Member

   More actions

   IMO jsbin is better for polished concrete examples and jsfiddle is better for, well, fiddling. If ever I throw something together on the fly to demonstrate something for a user on a question/in chat then I use jsfiddle, but if you have a static example of some specific technique that won't change and all you want is a link to throw at people who ask "how do I do X" then I would say jsbin is more suited.

   Just my $0.02
5. Wes1262 commented on May 7, 2013

   

   Wes1262

   on May 7, 2013

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   do you mean your ₤ 0.02 ? :-P

   i don't know jsbin much, i only know that jsfiddle is very annoying, that's why i'm asking
6. Wes1262 commented on May 7, 2013

   

   Wes1262

   on May 7, 2013

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   @kyRAD are you sure examples will not be limited somehow?
7. mainerror commented on May 7, 2013

   

   mainerror

   on May 7, 2013

   Member

   More actions

   @WesNetmo In what way?
8. Wes1262 commented on May 7, 2013

   

   Wes1262

   on May 7, 2013

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   well for example, unless pages are stored on a third level domain seems difficult that javascript would be enabled on them
9. mainerror commented on May 7, 2013

   

   mainerror

   on May 7, 2013

   Member

   More actions

   @WesNetmo and me discussed that in chat. His concerns were about having access to GitHub's cookies which has been addressed by GH by moving their GH pages service to a .io domain. So GH cookies won't be accessible form GH pages.