You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2025-09-09] [$250] mWeb-Keyboard appear briefly when press device back button on selector #68191
Version Number: v9.1.91-0 Reproducible in staging?: Yes Reproducible in production?: No If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:#67579 Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):ndk.2303+approver@gmail.com Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team Device used: Android 16 / Pixel 7A/ Chrome App Component: User Settings
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.2.0-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
@dominictb@Christinadobrzyn The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion: NA
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Aug 8, 2025
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
melvin-bot commentedon Aug 8, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @Christinadobrzyn (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.melvin-bot commentedon Aug 8, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @inimaga (
DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.melvin-bot commentedon Aug 8, 2025
💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source
48 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 2, 2025
Reviewinglabel has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".melvin-bot commentedon Sep 2, 2025
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.2.0-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-09-09. 🎊
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
melvin-bot commentedon Sep 2, 2025
@dominictb @Christinadobrzyn The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
Christinadobrzyn commentedon Sep 4, 2025
@dominictb please let us know about a regression test. TY!
dominictb commentedon Sep 5, 2025
BugZero Checklist:
Bug classification
Source of bug:
Where bug was reported:
Who reported the bug:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/55157/files#r2324542782
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion: NA
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue: https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/545695
Regression Test Proposal
Test:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎
Christinadobrzyn commentedon Sep 9, 2025
Payment summary - #68191 (comment)
Regression test - #68191 (comment)
Done! Closing