You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Due for payment 2025-02-18] [Due for payment 2025-02-13] Track expense - App is stuck on the confirmation page when submitting expense to someone #56307
Version Number: 9.0.94-1 Reproducible in staging?: Yes Reproducible in production?: Unable to check If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Exp Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):applausetester+sj9032@applause.expensifail.com Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team Device used: Mac 15.0 / Chrome App Component: Money Requests
Action Performed:
Go to staging.expensify.com
Go to Expenses.
Create an unreported expense (report is set to none).
Log in to staging.new.expensify.com with the same account.
Go to self DM.
Click on the expense created on Old Dot.
Click on the report header.
Click Submit it to someone.
Select any user or workspace.
On confirmation page, click Create button.
Expected Result:
The expense will be submitted to the destination without issue.
Actual Result:
App is stuck on the confirmation page when submitting expense to someone.
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
What specific scenarios should we cover in automated tests to prevent reintroducing this issue in the future?
NA
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
NA
Reminder: Please use plain English, be brief and avoid jargon. Feel free to use images, charts or pseudo-code if necessary. Do not post large multi-line diffs or write walls of text. Do not create PRs unless you have been hired for this job.
@techievivek@NicMendonca@techievivek The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
changed the title [-][Due for payment 2025-02-13] Track expense - App is stuck on the confirmation page when submitting expense to someone[/-][+][Due for payment 2025-02-18] [Due for payment 2025-02-13] Track expense - App is stuck on the confirmation page when submitting expense to someone[/+]on Feb 11, 2025
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.95-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
@techievivek@NicMendonca@techievivek The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
1b. Mistake during implementation
1c. Backend bug
1z. Other:
Where bug was reported:
2a. Reported on production (eg. bug slipped through the normal regression and PR testing process on staging)
2b. Reported on staging (eg. found during regression or PR testing)
2d. Reported on a PR
2z. Other:
Who reported the bug:
3a. Expensify user
3b. Expensify employee
3c. Contributor
3d. QA
3z. Other:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment:
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
Regression Test Proposal Template
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Activity
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 4, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @techievivek (
DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.melvin-bot commentedon Feb 4, 2025
Triggered auto assignment to @NicMendonca (
Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.melvin-bot commentedon Feb 4, 2025
💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source
github-actions commentedon Feb 4, 2025
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
IuliiaHerets commentedon Feb 4, 2025
Production behaviour
bandicam.2025-02-04.11-33-48-150.mp4
mkzie2 commentedon Feb 4, 2025
Proposal
Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.
App is stuck on the confirmation page when submitting expense to someone.
What is the root cause of that problem?
It comes from #55341. When the expense is created in OldDot
actionableWhisperReportActionIDisundefinedthen it's stuck here.App/src/libs/actions/IOU.ts
Lines 4428 to 4430 in 582a892
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?
Remove
!actionableWhisperReportActionIDcondition hereApp/src/libs/actions/IOU.ts
Lines 4428 to 4430 in 582a892
What specific scenarios should we cover in automated tests to prevent reintroducing this issue in the future?
NA
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)
NA
Reminder: Please use plain English, be brief and avoid jargon. Feel free to use images, charts or pseudo-code if necessary. Do not post large multi-line diffs or write walls of text. Do not create PRs unless you have been hired for this job.
techievivek commentedon Feb 4, 2025
Seems like a regression and was already pointed out by the reviewer here https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1738663295636299?thread_ts=1738661984.529329&cid=C01GTK53T8Q, @nkdengineer @allgandalf do you mind taking a look and fixing this up? Thanks.
14 remaining items
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 6, 2025
@techievivek @NicMendonca @techievivek The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
[-][Due for payment 2025-02-13] Track expense - App is stuck on the confirmation page when submitting expense to someone[/-][+][Due for payment 2025-02-18] [Due for payment 2025-02-13] Track expense - App is stuck on the confirmation page when submitting expense to someone[/+]melvin-bot commentedon Feb 11, 2025
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.95-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-02-18. 🎊
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 11, 2025
@techievivek @NicMendonca @techievivek The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
NicMendonca commentedon Feb 13, 2025
BugZero Checklist:
Bug classification
Source of bug:
Where bug was reported:
Who reported the bug:
[Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.
Link to comment:
[Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.
Link to discussion:
[Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
Regression Test Proposal Template
[BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Link to issue:
Regression Test Proposal
Precondition:
Test:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎
melvin-bot commentedon Feb 17, 2025
@NicMendonca, @techievivek Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!
techievivek commentedon Feb 17, 2025
No need for BZ checklist, it was a regression and was fixed by the original author. Closing this since we don't need to make any payment here.