Skip to content

ddox problems #10

Open
Open

Activity

  1. John-Colvin commented on Aug 11, 2015

    @John-Colvin
    MemberAuthor
  2. 9il commented on Aug 11, 2015

    @9il
    Member
  3. 9il commented on Aug 12, 2015

    @9il
    Member

    No, we can migrate later.

  4. John-Colvin commented on Aug 12, 2015

    @John-Colvin
    MemberAuthor

    Yes, we should stick with ddox for now. Swapping from harbored-mod back to ddox would be hard if we e.g. used ant of its markdown syntax, but ddox -> harbored-mod should be easy if we find we need to at a later date.

  5. John-Colvin commented on Aug 12, 2015

    @John-Colvin
    MemberAuthor

    @jansengb only for the filter stage. dub is rubbish for configuring ddox, I've rolled our own solution (see e.g. DlangScience/clFFT-D#4)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions