You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current implementation sets minimumThickness at 260. If we snapped at 270, the way between 270 and 260 feels slightly laggy. Should we decrease the lower boundary a bit?
Currently sidebar dock icons are perfectly fit because minimumThickness is 260. Is space between icons should increase when the width is more than 270? If so, by what value does it increase?
Activity
yapryntsev commentedon Dec 30, 2022
I'd like to take this issue.
lukepistrol commentedon Dec 30, 2022
@yapryntsev thx! Assigned it to you!
yapryntsev commentedon Dec 30, 2022
I need a couple of clarifications:
minimumThicknessat 260. If we snapped at 270, the way between 270 and 260 feels slightly laggy. Should we decrease the lower boundary a bit?minimumThicknessis 260. Is space between icons should increase when the width is more than 270? If so, by what value does it increase?austincondiff commentedon Dec 30, 2022
When width is 270 and above the spacing is normal at 15px.
It also seems like our icons are stretch (not proportioned correctly) we may need to set the aspect ratio to fit.

Snap Sidebar To Width (#882)
bombardier200 commentedon Jan 5, 2023
@austincondiff close this issue as we merged the PR for it!
lukepistrol commentedon Jan 11, 2023
@yapryntsev please have a look at the following comment regarding failing tests introduced in PR #882: