You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Lol, yes, I am experimenting with it right now. We are processing tons of data inside webworker and I am testing how msgpack + arraybuffer transfer will work.
But my concert is that we'll produce additional work for GC during msgpack parsing because native object transfer probably allocating objects in way that can be better handled by GC during transfer phase.
Activity
sergeyzenchenko commentedon Jun 4, 2019
Lol, yes, I am experimenting with it right now. We are processing tons of data inside webworker and I am testing how msgpack + arraybuffer transfer will work.
sergeyzenchenko commentedon Jun 4, 2019
But my concert is that we'll produce additional work for GC during msgpack parsing because native object transfer probably allocating objects in way that can be better handled by GC during transfer phase.
gfx commentedon Jun 4, 2019
lol. 🆒
sergeyzenchenko commentedon Aug 7, 2019
Have you tested how it works comparing to structured cloning in WebWorkers? @gfx
gfx commentedon Aug 8, 2019
Not tested yet, because I have no project with web workers.
sergeyzenchenko commentedon Aug 8, 2019
ok, I am going to test in next week