Skip to content

singleton script update #36

Open
Open

Description

@unitycoder

Activity

  1. hasanbayatme commented on Aug 23, 2019

    @hasanbayatme
    Member

    It is almost better @unitycoder, maybe we just needs to add the missing features from that singleton, instead of replacing it fully.

  2. ajoumoki commented on May 6, 2026

    @ajoumoki

    @EmpireWorld This version looks cleaner and more robust. I’m good with replacing it if tests pass—what do you think?

  3. steinbitglis commented on May 7, 2026

    @steinbitglis
    Collaborator

    Isn't the original in terms of "Principle of least astonishment"? They both seem to do much more than a "singleton" is supposed to. You'd have to read the whole class to use them, not just expect a plain simple-to-understand singleton.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions